The hostile action was done by Justin Sun. Those who voted on his witness could be doing so because they disagreed with what the old Steem witness have done in the past, and was expecting that both parties reached an agreement and moved Steem foward.
@steemchiller is on example, but i have seen a lot of the "black listed" users expressed that they voted on Sun witness because they wanted both sides to talk and reach something better for the system.
So, assuming that everyone that voted for Justin witness as "bad people" is just as excluding as Justin Sun actions.
And again, instead of "blocking" these people, witness/developers responsability was/is to improve the system so the same thing doesn't happen on the future.
The hostile action was done by Justin Sun. Those who voted on his witness could be doing so because they disagreed with what the old Steem witness have done in the past, and was expecting that both parties reached an agreement and moved Steem foward.
@steemchiller is on example, but i have seen a lot of the "black listed" users expressed that they voted on Sun witness because they wanted both sides to talk and reach something better for the system.
So, assuming that everyone that voted for Justin witness as "bad people" is just as excluding as Justin Sun actions.
And again, instead of "blocking" these people, witness/developers responsability was/is to improve the system so the same thing doesn't happen on the future.
No one was blocked or blacklisted, people who supported the steem hostile takeover did not receive free money.
What example is that?
There's no such thing as "playing neutral" when you are actually voting.
Do you go to the political ballet and vote each parties equally and call them a "neutral" vote?
Even in the US, a "neutral" vote wouldn't be voting for both Democrats and Republicans.
FFS man.
Never said neutral.
What i said was that they disagreed with witness, but also didn't fully supported Justin.
The whole problem i see is that they were excluded because they didn't fully support the old witness (before or after the take over, doesnt matter).
So this works like blaming the voter instead of fixing the problem(wich is still adjusting the system to not allow this to happen again).
May want to revisit his stance on the matter. A few of them likes to use the "balance" nonsense.
That equates to support. End of discussion.