Well done, lots of ideas converged there into one post and theory of life. I like it and agree with the concepts, based on my studies.
One detail I would refine is the concept of our being god. According to the Sanskrit Veda - the spirit - the living entity is part and parcel of the Source, but while being in quality non-different, or one with Source/God, we are in quantity very small fragments compared to the source. This philosophy is called "achintya bhedabheda tattva" or simultaneous oneness and difference. We are in quality like god but in quantity minute compared to the source. There soul and Supersoul, one Supersoul in everyone, alongside the individual soul, who is localized as opposed to the all-pervading Supersoul. The Sanskrit terms are "atma" for soul and "Paramatma" for Supersoul. It is misleading to say you are god or we are all god, which is not accurate and only part of the truth. This impersonalist philosophy is part of the demonic negative illusion spread by those envious of the source, who think they can be god. Your reference Russel may not have studied Vedanta or the Vedas, the original true source of this subject matter. Yogis of ancient Vedic culture have massive reference info, experience and history from which to glean the truth, so I recommend any sincere esotericist to investigate the Vedas.
Hi, thank you for this. In my own exploration (I have not read the Vedas, but am becoming more familiar with them) I have flitted between the idea of 'being God' and being a fragment of source. What you say sounds similar to the Gnostic idea of 'divine spark.
My use of the phrase 'you are God' was more of a call to action for readers than an ontological truism. I do generally err far more on the side of what you describe as "achintya bhedabehda tattva"... if I comprehend it correctly. I will need to dive into it properly. No matter how much I learn, there is always a lot more -- doors leading to doors it seems. I just keep on opening them.