You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A possible ECOBANK model for revision and feedback

in LeoFinance3 years ago

Maybe screen possible holders and not sell the stuff on engine readily?

I'm not sure if I understood the legal stuff right but what if there were legal consequences that required an anon holder to be accountable for just holding a token and laws to ownership with its responsibilities may be in conflict with the owner's country origin. And in events where ownership is passed on frequently by trade, does the account take a snap shot of its holders within a specific period and must hold x amount to qualify for dividends?

Sort:  

I agree with this.
I love the Idea but as token holders where do we stand if the endeavor fails. Will token holders be held accountable?
If bankruptcy occurs will Token holders be asked by the government to help pay any outstanding money?
These are things we need to know before investing.

I personally love the Idea. I would love to see this become a great success story. Just have to make sure we all know what we are in for before investing.

Limited Liability protection will be given to all holders, so 'only can lose what you put in' does apply here.

The land does back the tokens so even if we decide to stop, there should be some value locked to give back to token holders. Hopefully we will not have to go into debt of any kind.

I believe we have a solution to your issue in this post, please review and give more feedback! Thank you!