You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LMAC Automation | LMAC Automatisierung (Dev-Blog #2) [EN | DE]

Wow wow wow! You are so far ahead of the job! I have nothing but congratulations for you since I don't understand all that technical jargon! 😁

What I can tell you is that if that way we are going to see the images when we are doing the searching, then I would like them to be a little bigger. Well, that's what I personally suggest, but let's see what others think.

Great job @Quantumg, keep up the good work!👍

Sort:  

Many thanks, also for the tip. :-)

That's right, if you're looking for something, it would be nice to be able to see it. ^^
It's a bit of a balancing act that on the one hand the images are loaded resource efficient and fast, on the other hand that they can still be seen well.
So the thumbnails could be made a only bit bigger. I think a maximum width of 300 in width. After all, that's twice as big as now. What do you think? Is a width 300 Pixel ok?
About 38% of all mobile users have a screen width of 320 pixels in portrait mode (which is the most common used) and about 30% of all internet users exclusively use mobile devices for things they do on the Internet. So at least a lot of mobile users would see the thumbnails in a size that fills the screen width.