Right now in the middle of the coronahoax is prime time to bring attention to the eugenics agenda of vaccinations. There is an ever increasing flood of information showing the real agenda behind injecting people with toxins under the guise of making them "safe"
That information is not just being censored on platforms like Facebook. It is being downvoted on Hive as well, by the same accounts that were downvoting it on Steemit.
Information on the vaccine eugenics agenda needs to be shared on all platforms...
Raggedy Anne - a doll created by Johnny Gruelle, the father of a 13 year old girl killed by vaccination in 1915. She was vaccinated in a public school, without parental consent. Of the seven physicians called in on the case, six pronounced it in emphatic terms MALPRACTICE. The seventh did not commit himself, being the head of the school board and a firm advocate of vaccination.
First-Ever Peer-Reviewed Study Of Vaccinated Vs Unvaccinated Children Shows Vaccinated Kids Have A Higher Rate Of Sickness, 470% Increase In Autism
According to sources close to the project, the study had been reviewed and accepted by two different journals, both of which pulled back on their approval once the political implications of the findings became clear. That’s largely because, as parents have long expected, the rate of autism is significantly higher in the vaccinated group, a finding that could shake vaccine safety claims just as the first president who has ever stated a belief in a link between vaccines and autism has taken office.
Related: Cancer epidemic due to the introduction of viruses through vaccinations, SV-40 on trial
Working in partnership with the National Home Education Research Institute (NHERI), Dr. Anthony Mawson led a research team that investigated the relationship between vaccination exposures and a range of over 40 acute and chronic illnesses in home schooled children, a population chosen for its high proportion of unvaccinated children.
Surveying families in four states–Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Oregon - the study (officially titled Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports), reported a number of startling findings.Vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with a neurodevelopmental disorder: most notably, the risk of being affected by an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) was 4.7 fold higher in vaccinated children; as well, ADHD risk was 4.7 fold higher and learning disability risk was 3.7 fold higher.
Overall, the vaccinated children in the study were 3.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with some kind of neurodevelopmental disorder.Vaccinated children were also significantly more likely to be diagnosed with an immune-related disorder. The risk of allergic rhinitis (commonly known as hay fever) was over 30 times higher in vaccinated children, while the risk of other allergies was increased 3.9 fold and the eczema risk was increased 2.4 fold.
Related: Newly Discovered Autism Causes Ignored
With respect to acute illness and infectious disease the outcomes were in some respects surprising. As might be expected, unvaccinated children were significantly (4-10 times) more likely to have come down with chicken pox, rubella or pertussis.
Perhaps unexpectedly, the unvaccinated children were less likely to suffer from otitis media and pneumonia: vaccinated children had 3.8 times greater odds of a middle ear infection and 5.9 times greater odds of a bout with pneumonia.The study was based on a survey with participants recruited in a process led by NHERI and coordinated through 84 state and local homeschool groups. The survey itself was, according to the authors, “nonbiased and neutrally worded.”
These findings in a study population of 666 children, 261 of whom (39%) were unvaccinated, are sure to stir controversy, in part because it is the first of its kind. The scientific literature on the long-term effects of the vaccination program is virtually silent.
Most studies on the safety of vaccines only consider immediate or short-term effects. There was no obvious explanation for the differences in health outcomes observed between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups of children other than vaccination itself.The finding that vaccination is a significant risk for autism is the most explosive finding in the paper. For well over a decade, parents concerned that vaccines were involved in autism’s sharp rise have been calling for what has long been labelled the “vax/unvax” study.
Related: Cot Deaths Linked To Vaccinations + Harvard Medical School Doctor: Vaccine Science Is Not Settled
Public health officials such as Paul Offit have resisted these calls with claims that a comparative study of autism risk and other health outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated children would be retrospectively impossible and prospectively unethical.
Despite opposition from those like Offit, attempts to launch a formal vax/unvax study have been made for many years. In 2006, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D, NY) authored what is now called Vaccine Safety Study Act.
Said Maloney to the opponents, “Maybe someone in the medical establishment will show me why this study is a bad idea, but they haven’t done it yet.”In 2007, Generation Rescue (one of the Mawson study’s sponsors) retained a market research firm to undertake a similar survey (it is available on line and had similar findings but was never published in a scientific journal).
Less formal surveys focused on whether or not autism was present in the unvaccinated have also been undertaken in unusual populations, including the Amish and the patients of alternative health practitioners. Age of Autism founder Dan Olmsted investigated autism in the Amish, who vaccinate less frequently.
Autism is rare among the Amish and the only autistic Amish children we discovered were also vaccinated. (Others reported cases in Amish children with birth defects, but not “idiopathic autism,” the kind that occurs in otherwise typical children who are the heart of the current epidemic).The late Mayer Eisenstein reported in his HomeFirst practice in Chicago that he delivered more than 15,000 babies at home, and thousands of them were never vaccinated. Of these unvaccinated children, none had autism.
Related: Another Big-Screen Movie Just Released Investigates Vaccines For Autism Implications
The link between autism and vaccination became a hot topic in this year’s presidential election. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton once tweeted “The science is clear: The earth is round, the sky is blue, and #vaccineswork. Let’s protect all our kids. #GrandmothersKnowBest.”
In contrast, President Donald Trump has long been outspoken about the likely connection between vaccines and autism. As early as 2007, Trump remarked;| “When I was growing up, autism wasn’t really a factor. And now all of a sudden, it’s an epidemic. Everybody has their theory, and my theory is the shots. They’re getting these massive injections at one time. I think it’s the vaccinations.” |
In the absence of any published evidence on the question, the call for a vax/unvax study has become a rallying cry for autism advocates. Now it appears, the results confirm what many have long suspected.
These findings, especially the significant link between autism risk and vaccination, are certain to increase pressure on public health officials inside and outside the government to acknowledge the legitimacy of a concern they have long dismissed.Like any study, this one is open to critique. One will be its relatively small sample size, relatively high ASD rate (3.3% overall as compared to 2.24% in the closest comparable CDC study) as well as the funding sources.
Most studies that have found no link between autism and vaccination have been pharma or government funded, and the media has not considered that significant enough to mention.
Related: Mainstream Medicine Accidentally Handed Us Hard Core Backhanded Proof That Vaccines Cause Autism
Nonetheless, expect a hue and cry that money for this study came in part from sources concerned about a possible vaccine-autism link.
Note: Here is the funding statement from the leaked paper. “This study was supported by grants from Generation Rescue, Inc., and the Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute, charitable organizations that support research on children’s health and vaccine safety.
The funders had no role or influence on the design and conduct of the research or the preparation of reports.” Generation Rescue is a Founding National Sponsor of Age of Autism. - Article From: ageofautism.comRelated Articles:
One Year Old Dies After Vaccination, Death Ruled Unexplained Due To Natural Causes & Questions To Ask Pro Vaxers
The Controversy Over Who Is Responsible for Coronavirus Is Heating Up
Secret Court Issuing Website "Takedown" Orders in America, Targeting "Vaccine Truth" Sites
Healthy 4 Month Old Dies of “Natural Causes” A Week After 7 Vaccines
Pediatricians say it’s often better to let a child’s fever run its course
The 1918 "Spanish Flu" Influenza Epidemic Was a Vaccine-Caused Disease
Vaccine Failures: The Glaring Problem Officials Are Ignoring. Part I: Measles Vaccination
Cochrane Founder Warns Flu Vaccine Research Is Corrupted
The Failure of the Influenza Vaccine According to the Medical Literature
Altering Human Genetics Through Vaccinations
New Jersey Defeats Mandatory Vaccine Bill
Aluminium could be a factor in Alzheimer's disease, new research finds
“He Died As A Direct Result of the HPV Vaccine” – Mother Of Deceased Teenager Claims
U.S. Govt Loses Landmark Vaccine Lawsuit & Expert Study Shows Vaccinations Actually Turn Your Own Bodies Immune System Against You
Interesting stuff!
Congratulations @niff! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Your next target is to reach 50 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPThere's no conclusive link between vaccines and autism. There is however a link between autism and children who live in heavily industrialized areas. A study was done out in California in a heavily industrialized area after many children living around the area developed autism. The conclusion was that where a child lived may play a role in the development of autism.
Another key note I took of this study was home schooled vs non home schooled children. There's a economic factor that would lay heavy among that analysis which I don't see displayed here. Home schooled children are more prone to come from middle to higher income better educated households who don't live in heavily industrialized or older housing where lead and older industrialized area's were once common.
Then there's also no mention of the role that plastics has played since the increase of autism cases. There's quite a bit of evidence coming forth showing that infertility among younger adults today may be linked to the heavy use of plastics in todays society. There are more than likely many other links to health issues when it comes to plastics but plastics are made from oil and linked to millions of jobs globally....that's the real precursor as to why no one's willing to look into the adverse health issues faced by many people today. If you want to find a true culprit to blame vaccines, in my opinion, would be low man on the totem pole compared to the use of plastics that are in virtually everything we touch now a days. It isn't even everything we touch either it's what's inhaled out into the air. Many of our clothes are now made with synthetic plastics, these micro particles are washed off into our waterways and blown off into the air from drying our clothes....there's a much more reasonable reason to believe that if there is more allergies and asthma now a days that it once again would stand a greater chance to be linked to plastics than any vaccine.
I think people who don't want to vaccinate themselves or their children will have their reasons. Saying no to something you don't agree with seems legitimate to me, and in principle saying no would be enough without giving any further reasons. Often we don't know how to explicitly say the reasons ourselves, we have different thoughts and arguments at different times and it is difficult to give a single reason.
Unfortunately, the 'no' is not accepted by others, especially in relation to vaccination. So we look for arguments to support or reinforce our own rejection. Since it has become customary nowadays to use scientific papers for this purpose, this is what they do. In science, both positions can always be found.
To position oneself as a critic of vaccination is not only not socially acceptable, it threatens to become a taboo subject. I think you might agree that truth is not to be found per se in the majority. So I think it's important to recognise that the widespread support for vaccination is not solely due to the belief that it will work, but that the danger of being ostracised as a refuser and becoming socially unacceptable is a very real danger.
From my point of view, the ostracism and exclusion of vaccination sceptics is illogical, because those who are themselves convinced of vaccination can have themselves vaccinated and can henceforth be relaxed about those who do not. So where is the problem?
You would think right?....but the problem is that the media, doctors and the CDC are busy telling people that the non vaccinated are the ones spreading covid that are creating the break through cases. That isn't the reality of it in places like Israel who have vaccinated a majority of their people but it's the vast majority of the vaccinated who are spreading it. There was never any chance what so ever that vaccinating during a pandemic would stop the spread of covid because you could never vaccinate everyone at the same time. Many people were bound to give covid to vaccinated individuals. Where the big ouch comes in is that people actually believe that if the non vaccinated would go get vaccinated these break through cases would stop....but it's gone beyond that now, they don't understand that covid is more rampant among the vaccinated now then the non vaccinated because their are more vaccinated then non vaccinated people, it's a sixty to forty percentage with the non vaccinated being the later, it's just the CDC hiding the number of vaccinated people getting covid by not requiring the reporting of them unless hospitalized or death occurs. What I find even more shocking is that people actually think they have immunity from covid if they are vaccinated. There was an article here the other day where a hospital is going to require everyone working there to get vaccinated, you'd been surprised at the number of comments from people commenting they don't want to go see their doctor or nurse who hasn't taken the necessary steps like themselves to protect the public.....there is no protect the public, that horse went out the barn door weeks ago.
There is no logic in all this if you ask me. Contradictions at every turn.
Personally, I have a relaxed view of diseases that are attributed to "viruses". I've spent long enough on the subject, it would go too far to put it in the answer here. But have a look at @active-truth 's blog, there you will find largely mirrored what I myself think about this matter (or check my blog where I here and there touch it).
Simultaneity, I agree, is impossible to achieve anyway, and certainly not if you want to force it. With such a strong intrusion into the lives of individuals, resistance is not only acceptable but also provoked. After all, it would be a complete illusion to assume that all people are equally committed to a single story and behave "like one man".
Greetings to you.
Plastics may well be unhealthy, but your attempt to ignore vaccines and focus on plastic is extreme cognitive dissonance bordering on delusional... One day you will have to grasp what is going on here! Or not...
This is an old picture - make that one in 50 for American children
Just to show you how easy it is to take a time frame of a development and attach it to a scientific finding of distinction and make a meme of it, I went and looked up the history of autism. It's been around since before the mid 1700's. As with most medical discoveries there wasn't always a correlation to a cause. That's been true of many mental and neurological disorders as scientist/psychiatrist and others have sorted them out throughout the years. Just because a distinction became more clear in 1943 that autism became dislodged from schizophrenia and given it's medical terminology as a classified distinction does not mean it developed as a result of vaccines, it was always there throughout history but it took years to define it into it's own category unrelated to other mental disorders.
What you and many others try and do is make a correlation to something that isn't true to fit an agenda. Science is advanced enough on the issues to know it's gene related and how those genes react in certain environments that trigger it. You simply cannot continue to ignore developing science. You may be able to further propagate your theories if it wasn't for the fact that autism is being proven to be more prevalent in areas where children live in heavily industrialized areas. The fact autism has grown over the years is because the population has grown. That would also rationalize why the Amish don't have the same problem with autism as the general population, they don't live in heavily industrialized areas.
Anybody could play your unscientific game and take any disease discovered (or defined) during the first few years of vaccine develop and blame it on vaccines then proceed to spend years making meme's and defending your view points based on them.
There is not much point arguing with vaxers or any other variety of mind programmed believers, so there is also no point in getting into why germ theory is bullshit, or why gene theory is bullshit too, but I'll just keep posting information for people who are ready for it and stick to memes for replying!
x
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2015/10/03/no-more-monkeying-around-about-vaccines-and-autism/?sh=306447eba667
http://www.thinkingautismguide.com/2012/05/whacking-monkeys-in-name-of-science.html