We didn't mint tokens. Those tokens belongs to WINE-ICO that processed at the beginning of the token launch. 70K extra tokens were there. (If we have a chance, we will sue these tokens to add staking feature to WINE token.)
Without that feature, anyone can cheat the token rewards.
Like I said before, we have keys of @wine-token, but we won't do manual mints via that.
Yes that's what I meant. Without that feature WINEX is vulnerable. It can misuse by people who could get the trick and blacklist is the only way to protect the reward mechanism in that case. But if we have a chance to allow Staking feature (7 days - 14 days power down period) can fix this issue. So, if we get a chance we will sell those WINE ICO to add staking feature with WINEX token.
Rest will burn!
We didn't mint tokens. Those tokens belongs to WINE-ICO that processed at the beginning of the token launch. 70K extra tokens were there. (If we have a chance, we will sue these tokens to add staking feature to WINE token.)
Without that feature, anyone can cheat the token rewards.
Like I said before, we have keys of @wine-token, but we won't do manual mints via that.
You might mean... "If we have a chance, we will use these tokens to add staking feature to WINEX token." (WINE already has staking ability)
Yes that's what I meant. Without that feature WINEX is vulnerable. It can misuse by people who could get the trick and blacklist is the only way to protect the reward mechanism in that case. But if we have a chance to allow Staking feature (7 days - 14 days power down period) can fix this issue. So, if we get a chance we will sell those WINE ICO to add staking feature with WINEX token.
Rest will burn!