Statism relies heavily on the welfare state. If your life on paper looks like your below or close to the poverty level, the state will typically not engage you to extract wealth.

There is no measure of how efficient one persons life condition is as compared to another. That creates the opportunity for freedom folks to build wealth under the radar by utilizing efficiency.

Since first realm systems rely on first realm efficiencies, this shouldn't be difficult to outpace.

The bigger problem I see in second realm is in the concept as a social construct.

Social constructs are open to infiltration, as many of your videos explain and attempt to prevent.

I propose not using the realm model as much as the outpost model, where each person represents a outpost.

If second realm had any organizational characteristics, the state would invent something under the RICO Act to shut it down.

It may take some time to analyze ultra anarchy methods of exchanging without organization. Similar to 'cold calling' there could be 'cold trading' that could provide enough of a decentralized market that would not be infiltrated.

There would be no records of what was traded or who was trading. Even the term 'trading' could be a problem, as the state has seen fit to be the regulator of trade.

Maybe call it gifting, or something outside legal terms of trading.

https://steemit.com/secondrealm/@joesal/second-realm-mapping