Sort:  

I'll just point out correlation isn't causation, anybody with a minimal understanding of statistics should know that.

You don't have to point that out because I just said in the comment you're responding to, "These graphs are not indicative of the cause of Autism, yet they're are clearly correlated." And all that means is I'm considering/acknowledging these factors and their roles. I'm not sure if you're reading my comment. Further to my point, you go on to insult me and accuse me of "pushing" "pseudo science" like I'm some type of well funded, organized, corporate governmental body like the AMA or the AMA or the FDA which are actually guilty of "pushing" "pseudo science"...

Stop pushing your harmful pseudoscience on people, it won't work.

Please, explain how what I'm saying is "pseudo science" or "harmful". Or in anyway inaccurate for that matter. I'm open to discussion. It seems you are not, @johngreenfield, so sorry you were offended at any point. Even though you have you have been insulting and condescending, I still may be willing to continue this conversation.

I have neither the time nor the patience. I have taken the time to respond to your kind in the past, and I'm not a fan of pissing into the wind. I find your ignorance and stupidity to be both bewildering and angering. Would you kindly go fuck yourself. You don't seem to take hints.

Ok. You're mad. I'll take a hint, take my stupidity and ignorance with me and go 'fuck myself' while I piss into the wind. God bless!