So I was asked this question on Facebook, and wasn't sure how to answer. I was asked if it's the same as the current fiat system, i.e. it has value because the users of it all agree that it has value.. I think that's the correct answer, albeit with slightly more tech.
It has value because remote users that maintain the ledger all agree that it has value based on number of coins mined versus the coin limit? Am I thinking along the right lines here? Is the value derived from scarcity or trust?
Can the Steemit community answer this question?
I looked through Coindesk for an answer and came fairly close, but not really what I was looking for. I can understand the tech of how it's created, how it's maintained etc but not where its actual value originates from.
That's what I'm looking for. Over to you.
It has value because:
And that's just at the current stage. There are many improvements and different implementations being built.
People ask me: "What real world value does a Bitcoin have?"
I ask them: "What digital value does gold have?"
You can't buy anything on the internet with gold. But you can with cryptocurrency. In fact, I am pretty sure soon gold will be tokenized into a cryptocurrency too. The true value of Bitcoin is that it can be used to buy digital things: parts of an infrastructure or digital fuel (Ethereum), or part of an online business (OmiseGo) or part of a new generation Facebook (Steem/it), and reap the rewards from that. Anybody who wants a piece, will need to have cryptocurrency (aka Bitcoin) to purchase them.
Gold isn't better because it's physical. In this new world it's worse because it's not digital.
Most of the gold in the world is still owned and monopolised by governments and central banks. Look at what happened to Qaddafi. LOL