They don't have to list, they just have to commit to allowing for customers to withdraw credited tokens later. But if they do that, listing wouldn't be much more work. This requirement just prevents them from pocketing the tokens of their customers.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Can you specify which accounts are "those who actively contributed to (and publicly declared support for) the centralization of the Steem Blockchain."?
This seems to be added from what you wrote yesterday.
A long time ago I visited a secluded monastery in Mt Everest. There a monk shared with me some wise words:
😂
AHAHAHAHAHA!
If I were in charge, I would leave him in the dust too.
Hahaha xD Trevon getting cold feet. Nice Screenshot.
lol
Keep the screenshots coming, kind of like, "You're on Candid Camera."
Unvote while you still can!!! LOL
Nice attitude. I am not going to change anyway, but your comment encourages it even more.
Yeah, it would be much better if I begged you, made a bunch of empty promises, so I can later dump my coins on you. However bad you think it is, I'm sure having a ruler will work out much better. Enjoy.
I also have voted for "your" witnesses and even asked proxy token to vote for "your" witnesses per their request, and now people like you try to mock me.
Good job.
Btw, do you know me? I don't even know who you are.
Nope, but I was curious what the motivation would be for such a question, and low and behold. Seems like you are playing both sides. So was my "mock" of you completely unfounded? If so, my sincere apologies.
There are other users like @geekgirl who basically asked the same question. If you read this statement, it is a natural response (if you read details) as it was different from what blocktrades wrote yesterday and the phrase itself is vague.
And so far I tried to help two sides make compromise(i got some english postings about this also), but it seems that the split is inevitable.
Not sure how Hive would turn out, but I wish good luck.
Do you like Facebook?
They want to censor a part of the community simply because they disagreed with their view on the matter. How much more toxic can it get.
I still give 'benefit of doubt'. No answer yet.
Not giving an airdrop to someone is not censorship.
I agree with you, but i do not think this is the case at all.
It seems these accounts may be excluded completely.
They'll have 'their' steem 'network' soon.
Don't understand the rant of the people who voted for steemit stake. Now you'll have a weaker chain to control more easily.
Not in support of the soft fork doesn't necessarily mean one's in support of what JSun did. Don't mistake the two of them.
Good point, my fault there :)
Anyway, (in my opinion) seeing what JS did validated entirely the need of the Soft Fork. The takeover it's the proof which shows that the elected witnesses we're correct.
Greetings and have a good day.
u should list on newdex as a telos token and we should make IVE a telos smart contract
What is Telos? Did you say Hive is on Telos or will be?
Hi, Binance have just published their support of HIVE: https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360040692692
But please read it very carefully, looks like some discrepancies may arise.