I'm familiar with SuppoMan, and while i'm on the fence about banning, it depends on if the criticisms are constructive or not. In other words, if SuppoMan is banning folks that are trying to be helpful then i'll take issue with that.
The big picture is everyone has to do their due diligence when investing. No one knows when a coin/token will pop. There have been plenty of investments that have dropped only to reverse and hit the moon. But the final decision was yours to take certain advice and give it more or less weight than other information.
Overall I think people have the right to vent a little, but i'm sure Mr. SuppoMan provided no guarantees that something will moon in a certain amount of time. Do think otherwise is silly.
I agree, but to publicly roast someone who is posting on a different feed entirely? And- I was banned after that FIRST comment, and I dont think I was being nasty - well not nearly as nasty as Suppo. Also - I paid to be there, and as it is a discussion group - I thought I was free to discuss BQX in honesty - and the points I bring up are to help people do their 'due diligence' (i mean, we all say that, but really - we are all investing in electronic tokens here/ and like you said no one knows what will happen) - and that is my point - if someone is thinking they are in an uncensored environment , and everyone around them is: BUY BQX! -then from the research and discussion and fervor you might think: hey this is good! But what they haven't realized is that all non-cheerleaders have been kicked - and that is a false reality- and ripe conditions to fleece whomever should happen to come along.
This article, and my experience with Suppo, has been part of my due diligence, and the reason I posted it is so it can be part of someone elses.
For me- when I need a daily dose of someone elses opinion - I will head to @crypto-daily on dtube from now on: no pump and dump, no pump and HODL, no boosting coins that have nothing going for them - just great commentary about relevant altcoin news.
I agree with your points. Suppo should just let dissenting opinions free to operate. What's the point of a discussion group if Suppo's opinion is the only thing he wants disseminated.
At least you know he's not a big shot if he has time for this silly discussion monitoring. If he were a big shot, he wouldn't have time or care.