The real big selling point for me is the price point. The centralized servers are pretty solid and they deliver their promises well. It's juust this whole thing is achieved at greater cost. The so called centralized competitors have considerable spread themselves geographically. What NOIA does is taking things to the ground level automating most things and make up for the lack of powerful high tech hardware with massive decentralization and volume.
I see some have mentioned IPFS. I personally think multiple projects can co-exist and they will co-exist. I've had some trouble with streaming video off of IPFS and with monetization and accessibility, NOIA would hopefully make things better for me.
Targeting image hosting services is a great marketing plan IMO because images are widely used but require less delivery speed and performance. Also those who don't want to host much videos would be the ones that are most price conscious and price is the greatest strength of NOIA when it comes to selling the product to customers.
Hi @vimukthi, I am very grateful for your comment it's amazing. Sorry for so late reply, but I have been super busy this week.
I fully agree with you. Coexistence of various projects on the market is necessary, even in decentralized case. Monopolization leads to price manipulations and a lack of development, as you don't need to compete with anyone.
I have never heard about IPFS before this post, but the projects seems really interesting, especially as they have already deployed the product. Hope that your experience with NOIA will be better :)
Definitely yes.
One more time, thank you for your comment and have a great week!