It's a bit lame imo, I tried to not be opinionated about that in the post but it especially sucks seeing splinterlands miss out on a lot of rewards considering what they've done for the chain and the amount of stake they've bought up just so others can maximize their returns. Hopefully they'd consider changing how they go about voting the posts they curate.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The introduction of the linear reward curve was a big improvement and step into the right direction.
However, I see no reason at all to treat late votes (within the seven day reward window) differently than early votes. Treating them just equal would easily avoid cases like that of Splinterlands.
I place my 100% manual upvotes normally twice or thrice per week and thus see many posts of authors in my feed rather late.