Rataswamy

He portrays himself as having a little of something for everybody and for a large percentage of Americans he did have a little something for them. Ten minutes of watching Vivek Ramaswamy in an interview and my head was spinning. Usually when my head spins it's because of fast talking rats. Tonight I ran across an article and I decided maybe it was time for me to take a closer look at the rat. What a rat he was. That little something he gave to a lot of Americans was the lipid nanoparticle in the covid vaccine. It doesn't mention that on his Wiki page, but it does mention the companies that he owns, runs, chairs. Those names blinked like a neon sign in my eyes. I knew exactly where to go to find them listed. Dr. David Martins Fauci Covid 19 Dossier.

Seems the rat likes to purchase patents from larger pharmaceutical companies for drugs that had not been successfully developed and then bring them to market. Under the section in Martin's dossier titled: Convoluted Flow Of Funds That Evade Public Disclosure there's this tidbit:

"US patent 8,999,351 was issued to Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation in British Columbia. "In their patent they disclose that their research was supported by a grant from the National Institue of Allergy and Infectious Disease. (Grant HHSn266200600012C) Ironically this $23 million grant was awarded in 2006 to Ainylam Pharmaceutical Inc, not to Tekmira."

"In 2012, Alnylam agreed to pay Tekmira $65 million to settle legal dispute including a $1 billion damage claim for "relentless and egregious" misappropriation of Tikmira's trade secret. From the patents earliest prioriy of November 10, 2008, there is no public record of Tekmir's as the beneficiary of the NIAID grant. Nothwithstanding the lipid nanoparticle technology developed from this grant is the echnology now used in Moderna Covid 19 intervention. In their 10-Q filing Alnylam reports to have a License to technology from Arbutus - formerly Tekmira - which has accused Acuitas of misappropriating trade secrets and licensing them to Moderna and Pfizers collaboration with BioNTech."

Further on in the dossier there's this:

"On July 23, 2020 the patent trail and appeal board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office rejected Moderna's efforts to invalidate US Patent 8,058,069. This patent, owned by Arbutus BioPharma Corporation, (principally owned by Roivant Science LTD), covers the lipid nanoparticle required to deliver an mRNA vaccine. Some of the core technology was based on work originally done at the University of Bristish Columbia and was first licensed in 1998."

"mRNA - 1273 - the experimental vaccine developed by Moderna for Covid 19 - uses the LNP technology that Moderna thought it had licensed from Acuitas Therapeutic Inc, a firm developed by a former principle of Arbutus prior company Tekmira. That license did not authorize Moderna to use the technology for the covid 19 vaccine."

Part of Rataswamy bio on Wiki states: "He is the owner of Roivant Science, with the Roi in the name meaning return on investment. It goes on to say he is chairman of OnCore Biopharma, a position he maintained at Tekmira Pharmaceutical when the two companies merged in 2015 and he is chairman of the board at Arbutus Biopharmacy, a Canadian firm. The bio makes mention that Roivant Science has never made a profit. If he's so successful as he claims than how can that be? Because he starts up subsidiaries, gets investors to invest and if the patents he buys off larger pharmaceutical companies don't pan out the investors lose their money. He did this with a drug called intepirdine that he bought the patent from GlaxoSmithKline for five million dollars. The stock shot way up upon the announcement taking in hundreds of millions of dollars. GSK sold the patent when second stage of studies showed the drug didn't work. When a third study was done the same result ensued, and the stock fell losing millions for investors. He also did this with another patent he bought for a disease called gongliosidosis, the subsidiary he started was Axovant, which later changed to Sio Gene, upon the announcement of study results instead came a decision to shut down the company. Gongliosidosis effects about one out of one hundred to two hundred thousand people globally. You begin to see a pattern develop here and may be why in the Fauci dossier Martin listed the first statement under: Convoluted Flow Of Funds That Evade Public Disclosure. Just saying. Wink, wink.

It goes on to state that Rataswamy "calls himself a "scientist" and said he developed a number of medicines although his undergraduate degree is in biology, he was never a scientist, his role in the biotechnology industry was that of a financier and entrepreneur. Of further note is that he was caught trying to bribe someone to change up his Wiki page before he ran for president. (I clearly don't see how the best of the bloggers missed that one.) Arbutus goes on to be mentioned a few more times in the long list Martin assembled of those involved in the development of the corona virus and vaccine further into the dossier.

Now from the department of I was for it before I was against it comes this tidbit. "Although Rataswamy has centered his campaign on crusading against corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and environmental, social and corporate goverance (ESG) initiatives, RSV worked in support of pro DEI and ESG initiatives, including promoting health equity and diversity within the biopharma and biotech industries". In order to convince people that he has changed his evil ways he started up an investment firm called Strive Asset Management. Thus far the firm has raised about twenty million dollars from outside investors including Peter Thiel, JD Vance and Bill Ackman, done to position, he states, himself against woke Black Rock, State Street and Vanguard. He has also held a couple of meetings with former president Trump, which clearly explains his talking points.

If all those selling points don't sit well with you, he says he'll try and hitch his wagon onto Robert Kennedy Jr as his vice president if he gets nominated. That's how I know the majority don't know that a man who bought up failed medical patents made huge sums of money off selling that failed technology, someone by now would have asked Robert Kennedy how he feels about that. I know I'd be interested in his answer.