You offering no objectives to be held accountable against is now in favor of your overfunding

I wouldn't argue that there is no accountability on my end, everything that I do is open (since it's open source), I talk about what I'm doing on a bi-weekly manner (via the core dev meeting) + semi regular posts and everyone is free to criticize what I'm doing if they think it's moving too slow/not working on the right things.

Whereas it should be counted against other proposal's commitment to accountability? I would wager a guess that your fellow receivers of funding are also able to adequately tailor their time commitments to funding levels.

That's a fair point I guess I didn't explain myself clearly sorry about that. I talk about it in my other comment to @good-karma, basically I would like to see others take my approach and as I told him hivesigner/ecency and hive in general would benefit so much more from you hiring a contractor with the extra funds to work on some new features imho. What I'm ment is that my proposal can more easily expand to use more funding than something like hivesql/hivewatcher/banjo that has a set amount for supporting the infrastructure (and it makes no sense to get more funding to get a bigger infra if in 2 months hbd gets back to 1$ and you need to cancel your servers).