You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: New Scientist Magazine Calls for Compulsory Vaccinations

in #dtube5 years ago

"I thought Mr. Broze would be open to logic and he seems like a soul who doesn't want to hurt people"

No, I do not wish to hurt people and yes, I believe in logic.

" we have a moral obligation to show civil disobedience when there are unjust laws. "

Indeed, and this video is about people standing against efforts by the state to force vaccinate them (or any other action backed by force, coercion, or violence.

While there are reasons to question the safety of vaccinations (just search my videos and articles), but this video is focused on the philosophy behind allowing the government to forcibly medicate people. If you support that, I don't know how you can claim to care about not hurting people or wanting to spread love.

So without getting into the science, tell me what you want to know?

"You ever seen how fucking horrible polio is?"

never mentioned polio or called for banning polio or vaccines at large.

"Seriously Google it."

Please stop using google and use duckduckgo or an alternative.

"Research this topic or vaccines plz!! They are NOT bad. Just because you haven't seen the HORRORS of measles or folks on iron lungs doesn't mean the few oddities with vaccines justify this rhetoric."

Do you even know my position?

Sort:  

First, thank you for your response. I entered into this dialogue to learn more about your opinion and perhaps even to change my own thoughts or your thoughts. Either way, I hope we both gain value from this discourse.

I will say when you have an image as the cover for the video with anti-vaccine signs, assumptions are made. While this may be wrong, it's human nature. I am conscious of those assumptions now though and hopefully will have them set aside sufficiently.

I agree the state should not oppress but the state exists for three reasons in my mind. I am not an antichrist. I believe in small gov't though. The gov't should protect its citizen's life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. I say this so we can work from the same starting point. If you'd like me to discuss from a perspective of anarchy, I'd be happy to but I am not now. I also admit that I have little experience with anarchist views, most of which are from you ha!

**I then ask, in a philosophical manner, if someone does not get vaccinanted b/c of their beliefs and I get sick from them- is that not an encroachment of my own personal liberties? Is it not the gov't job to protect my life from others who choose not to get a vaccine?

I guess since you brought it up, I'd like to know your opinion on vaccines and why exactly the gov't shouldn't mandate them? Why is it so bad to force ppl to not get others sick? Is this coming from a place that's along the tune, "gov't is bad. All things gov't does is bad. Therefore, gov't doing this is bad." That opinion I can understand and respect. However, the scientific argument behind vaccines is a math problem in my mind. How many ppl got sick before them? How many after? To what degree did people get sick before? After? What was the overall damage done before vaccines? After vaccines?

Please don't get off topic with google. My use of Google is my own choice, while the company may do wrong things in the world, It has 0 to do with the vaccine conversation. I fear you or others will see this and think >> look at this "google using corporate shill of a man". That is not my intention. Truth is my intention and specifically truth regarding the topic of vaccines. I feel I have an obligation to strike this dialogue up with you because I respect you and I also believe you have a pure heart which is oddly refreshing for politics. This pure heart I believe allows for dialogue which would be a waste of time with many others. I hope you do not take offense to my harsh language and only see it as my passion for the world and a lust for life, which I know you have within you as well.

I look forward to hearing more from you. I hope together we can find the truth within the political issue of vaccines, mandates, the anti-vaxxer movement as a whole, and what role gov't should play in this.

Thank you for your time, good sir. Blessing to you!

Google is censored. If Google serves as your primary source of info, your knowledge and understanding is limited to the agenda driven search engine. Google is a tool of big government/corporations.

Called this one didn't I?

Posted using Partiko Android

You won't find the whole truth via Google. What did you call?