Bill Cosby Juror Speaks On Convicting Legend

A juror who voted to convict bill Cosby of sexual attack stated the comedian’s very own words did him in — and that he has no doubts he and other jurors reached the proper verdict, in line with a new file.

Harrison Snyder, who turned into juror No. 1, stated Cosby’s deposition from 2005 and 2006 in which he admitted giving Quaaludes to women he desired to sleep with became the damning proof that ultimately convinced the jury he was guilty.

“I assume it become his deposition, virtually. Mr. Cosby admitted to giving these Quaaludes to ladies, younger women, with a purpose to have intercourse with them,” Snyder advised ABC’s “correct Morning the usa” on Monday.

The 22-yr-antique stated he started off deliberations not understanding whether Cosby became responsible.

He made up his thoughts, but, after “listening to all of us’s feedback approximately positive portions of evidence and going thru the different counts,” he stated.

Cosby became convicted remaining week of three counts of sexual attack. each count number carries a 10-12 months prison sentence.

Snyder additionally said he believed testimony from Cosby’s leader accuser, Andrea Constand, who recalled for jurors in image detail how the now-eighty-year-antique comedian gave her drugs that made her pass out and the way she wakened to him sexually assaulting her at his suburban Philadelphia home in 2004.

5 other accusers who took the stand, despite the fact that Cosby become now not criminally charged with attacking them, were also credible, Snyder stated. however he might’ve convicted Cosby without their testimony.

“if you hadn’t heard from the alternative 5, and you simply had her word, would that have mattered to you?” asked ABC news reporter Linsey Davis.

“I don’t suppose so because in the deposition, he said that he gave those drugs to different women,” Snyder spoke back. “I don’t assume it surely necessarily mattered that these different five women had been here. due to the fact he stated it himself that he used those drugs on different ladies.”

“so you observed it to be his words that have been the maximum damning of all?” Davis asked.

“Yeah,” Snyder spoke back.

Snyder said the inconsistencies in Constand’s story approximately information surrounding the sexual attack — a crux of the protection’s case — became cleared up through prosecutors’ first witness, Dr. Barbara Ziv.

Ziv testified that victims of sexual attack probable gained’t have a clean or chronological recollection of activities — specially if an intoxicant is administered.

“a few have stated that I made the proper decision, and a few human beings have stated that they nevertheless assume that he’s innocent,” said Snyder. “and that i just tell them, if you have been there, you would say the identical element, you would say that he’s guilty.”

The juror said that, prior to being selected, he best knew that Cosby became an actor — and had by no means heard about the allegations that he drugged and molested a few 60 ladies.

“I actually didn’t realize lots. I knew he turned into an actor. I knew that he did ‘The Cosby show.’ I in no way watched ‘The Cosby display.’ I’m a touch too young for that,” Snyder said. “I didn’t recognise something. I don’t watch the information ever. So I didn’t even understand what he was on trial for.”

He stated the #MeToo motion wasn’t a component in his choice.

“I truely simplest determined out approximately it when I were given home. Then I appeared on line to look what the whole thing changed into. I didn’t simply even realize about the #MeToo movement,” Snyder said.