To all steemians, EOS had come to make understand that they had core value which they will continue to abide on. Naturally, they seem democratic.... "We will never waiver from our duty of keeping the EOS network stable and secure because of our commitment to the people on the network we serve. We believe doing the right thing while abiding by the rules outlined in the EOS constitution is always our true north in every decision we make. At the same time, we do not operate as a heartless machine, as those are the very types of organizational structures and processes we are trying to free ourselves (and others) from." Here are the team working to bring the vision of EOS into reality- Steves and Eugene
Prolly will work out as usual... After 1-2 years he will be leaving this projects and starting a new new project so he can make some more millions...
Is there something wrong with making multiple successful projects? And does @dan not deserve the money he has made off creating platform, Bitshares and now EOS? What is wrong with Dan Building something great and earning millions from it? Why is there this rumor being spread that Dan somehow must be restricted to only ONE project for life, as if he is not allowed to work on more than just steem. Steem doesn't do smart contracts.... EOS will... they will both be DPOS and EOS will promote DPOS and thus promote the underlying mechanics of Steem. Also about EOS crowdsale "dumping" their ethereum. that is just their money and they are selling it as planned before the main net launch to fund the project, it was never meant to be held as ethereum, they simply used ethereum to raise money for an ICO/crowdsale so why be angry about a very large eth bag holder selling? This is just how the markets work, why call someone greedy for making a sale of their own private funds, should he have HELD all his ethereum just to keep eth price up for the sake of eth bag holders? That doesn't sound very rational at all.