That's interesting that they acknowledged that they were omitting details. General we don't approach and ask about these things, so we don't get the full picture and wild probably assume they just didn't know those extras, rather than purposely omitting them. Yet if we'd only ask, then the truth would come out.
We once approached the human right commission in Australia about local HR breaches and their response was that they only dealt with human rights breaches by the federal government; pretty much yelling us that state governments have the freedom to bring in whatever laws they want with impunity.
Well, true. Eventually this is a vicious circle about gaining and keeping readers. What paper would propagate: Read less papers! And what authority would propagate: Care less for authority!
On the topic of HR I could open another book shelf. Not funny. Same with this big international AI organization. Amnesty? They raise funds in industrialized countries but they do not - can not - oppose against local HR issues. One mind-boggling example: German policy sais HR are void when it comes to schooling. It is even mendatory to phrase the intended breaches in the regional constitution and this alone already magically makes the breach lawfully legal. That's embarrassing!! And then, on top of that, people call all this an achievement and blame the symptoms onto the subjected - first parents, second pupils.
Anyway, all this only got to my attention after I turned off the wide spread media infusion of "news" and "gossip".