Well Chelsea is lacking in a lot so let's see how it goes and I might not make a change but then again there are price rises which is annoying
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well Chelsea is lacking in a lot so let's see how it goes and I might not make a change but then again there are price rises which is annoying
Price rises are very frustrating already. Though I'm yet to check, I'm 100% sure Haaland would've gained £0.1 by now.
My worry is what to do with Mahrez. If I'm getting in Haaland, Kane has to go. I ignored Spurs attack most of last season and it proved costly. I would've done Kulusevski to Mahrez but fixture and rotation threat scares me.
Price rise for Haaland and price fall for kane, I think inevitably you have to let go of Mahrez because he might be a sub on most days and you don’t want that chance.
I on the other hand will be bringing a Tottenham player soon, don’t know how I’ll do that though
Already ditched Kane for Haaland. That's a £0.2 loss. Kane plays at Stamford Bridge next, that's not an easy fixture. Will be letting go of Mahrez too and will replace him with Sterling. I think the dude will play a couple games as a striker this season for Chelsea.
I am not sure of sterling, never liked him in general and in my four seasons, I barely ever get in my team but there's a first time
I was hoping he'd take a more prominent role as a leader in Chelsea's attack. He was never a regular starter at Man City, that diminished interest in him. Also, the lack of quality midfield options is my reason for considering him. Just imagine the likes of Bailey and Neto being highly touted. Those guys wouldn't make my reserve on a good season.
The reason for those players is money, the hundred million gets worse every season.
The better players are becoming very expensive while the money remains the same. Looks like the Fantasy world is mimicking the real world since both worlds are battling inflation of players' values.