This really is a huge story, of course it's not getting the attention it deserves - oh look at the pretty balloons! The US is certainly responsible for the Nord Stream attack - cui bono? We can pose the same question with regards to Norway's alleged involvement, they stand to benefit as another large provider of gas to Europe. Also, the idea that Russia would bomb their own infrastructure is highly dubious and I think this is something most objective minds would agree with.
What we're looking at is an act of terrorism and an attack, not only on Russian, but German critical infrastructure. An obvious question that comes to mind is, does this attack invoke NATO article 5?
One last tidbit, maybe check the spelling of Hersh, in a few places it's written as 'Hirsh'. Cheers
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Personally the answer is really, who's the most mad at germany.
Unfortunately United States underwater demolition units already said how they would do it and why they can't do it. It would start a war with germany. And the fact maybe seals and underwater demolition units are bound to Congress oversight and unable to conduct such Black operations.
However if we really dig deep into the money part we see that this entire pipeline is German owned and operated. In a huge stealing win the entire operation employees as few Russians as possible and there's a big huge of revenue going directly to Germany instead of Russia Russia doesn't own or have any interest in the Nord stream pipeline and Russia is still really mad about all those military weapons and all that military aid going to ukraine..
How it was done proves this entire thing. The fact that you had multiple seismic level explosions going off? Yeah Russian underwater demolition units are based in the same exact area and able to travel by submarine over into that area do all their thing in roughly as close as possible by deploying huge amounts of explosives to ensure the job is taken care of.
However even still they failed whereas Western demolition units would have only had to use tiny shaped charges. Couple of ounces of explosives. Most likely less than even a pound for each charge. Because one tiny little penetration on that pipeline absolutely is going to catastrophically devastated with the resulting sympathetic terminal failure.
United States Navy seals coming out and laying out exactly what was needed and what was possible to do this?
The fact that the Navy diver that has done this is unnamed and the source is unknown turns this into fake news.
Unless this journalist proves this in court I think he's guilty of making it up. Maybe he's getting paid a lot of money for a bogus story. You got to realize that everybody now is been talking about that....
Personally I think Russia kicked off two charges and had a 75 percent success ratio. The rest of the world doesn't want to say anything. Especially because the Norwegian pipeline just went down.
But until Seymour Hirsch actually reveals his source and we can confirm this, it's suspect. Opinion.
Personally how is Biden going to pull this off I'd love to know. Where is the proof that the United States actually did it.
germany is still occupied and externally managed by US
https://oalexanderdk.substack.com/p/blowing-holes-in-seymour-hershs-pipe
Think this might clarify this.
I'll be writing this post later.
Thanks.
good take