Oh trust me I'm not defending YouTube, and you know I'm on your side, but the main impression I'm left with from this post is that you're bullshitting me because there's a misleading graphic about YouTube's earning distribution!
That 55-45 split is pretty common knowledge, you don't need a graphic in your promotional literature that implies it's 20-80 in favour of YouTube!
I don't know how many other people get to the first 'no that's wrong' and just stop reading, but it will be more than just me!
There's plenty of other arguments against YouTube to work with!
It’s definitely not 55-45 split. The information they garner about ur account and it’s viewers images it more like 85-15 to YouTube. Once content creators can store all of his value in their token economies, it will be very clear that it was never 55-45
Yes I thought that might be your reasoning, factoring in the total value, personally I'd not make that a headline point and get to it later, there's plenty else to focus on to criticise them.
True, but only a small percentage of the creators are eligible for the revenue share, and they use any excuse to demonetize the videos.
They've increased the required amount of views/followers recently as well.
Constantly moving the goal posts 🙄
A corporation abusing its power; who would of thought?
Oh trust me I'm not defending YouTube, and you know I'm on your side, but the main impression I'm left with from this post is that you're bullshitting me because there's a misleading graphic about YouTube's earning distribution!
That 55-45 split is pretty common knowledge, you don't need a graphic in your promotional literature that implies it's 20-80 in favour of YouTube!
I don't know how many other people get to the first 'no that's wrong' and just stop reading, but it will be more than just me!
There's plenty of other arguments against YouTube to work with!
It’s definitely not 55-45 split. The information they garner about ur account and it’s viewers images it more like 85-15 to YouTube. Once content creators can store all of his value in their token economies, it will be very clear that it was never 55-45
Yes I thought that might be your reasoning, factoring in the total value, personally I'd not make that a headline point and get to it later, there's plenty else to focus on to criticise them.