I believe that 24 hours is enough time to give all editors the opportunity to calmly and carefully read the posts and decide their vote.
The rush of having to read and vote in a short time is good for those who do nothing else in their life.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree. Users who are dedicated to the platform as their raison d'etre can possibly do the whole early voting thing in 9 hours (and maybe that's a good incentive to be dedicated to it), but I consider 24 hours is reasonable. I often don't see new posts for 2-3 days at times, but if I know there is a more reasonable 24 hour window I might be inclined to look at the platform more to vote more and comment more earlier. Too small a window seems like a window designed for bots/auto-votes and not humans. Too larger window creates no incentive. It's certainly a balance.
Hugs dear friend. Successes in your work at Hive. Your evaluation is an encouragement for our publications. Thank you.