Hello to you,

personally, I do not see the highest priority or even obligation in preserving my own health. I would even say that it is this very statement that, long before 2020, led to the event that then occurred, that health was designated as the highest social good. I speak out against such a view of what it means to be human. The moment you use this as an argument towards your perceived opponents, you confirm their view more than you doubt it.

a large percentage of human deaths could be prevented if those involved had sufficiently accurate and deep awareness/information regarding their own inner state.

To this I would like to add to my provocation and also reinforce this statement as a confirmation of those you describe as having too little knowledge of their inner world.

The expression "prevention of human death" is quite a shocker and double-edged.

Because when two supposedly opposing worldviews both talk about preventing death, however, they are not really opposing each other, but confirming to each other that this must be the first and foremost concern of human communities.

So as not to be misunderstood, I am not saying that the negative statement "one need not be concerned about the prevention of human death" is acceptable, rather I would avoid this formulation.

Since I am not you and you are using this formulation, I am asking if you are saying this because by doing so you are sending out a common form of communication and language that is meant to reach those who do have the same goal (prevention of death), and are "just on the wrong side"?

Be aware that we are surrounded by epic amounts of mind control and limiting belief systems that attempt to use guilt and fear to control us

Again I see more similarities than differences. When you say that death could have been prevented if those involved would have had wisdom, more lives could have been saved, is it not that you use guilt and fear in the very same way? The blame or shame in being seen as a killer works pretty well, I find on both spectrums. Not literally "well" in the sense that it takes steps to welcome the conflict but to harden the lines.

As Allan Watts put it, this could be seen as a game where "I am more enlightened than you are".