Building on a House of Cards

in Deep Dives4 years ago

The words that we use are crucial to understand the reality we are trying to convey and communicate about. Having beliefs is fine. All the knowledge we have that wasn’t demonstrated as truth is a belief. It might be true, but if we can’t demonstrate it then we don’t know that it is true, and can’t use the word truth to reference it. Thinking a belief is truth is what leads to false worldviews, a false ungrounded superstructure of belief taken as real.

Some things you saw demonstrated to you, but then you can’t demonstrate it again to another. The same for others. You can tell others things that you know are true, and they can tell you things that they know are true. But if neither of you can demonstrate it, the receiver only has a belief and can’t apply the word true to that. We can trust that person and what they say, and believe them. We have faith in what they say, and believe them. But we can’t say we know it’s the truth.

In contrast, imagine doing the opposite. Imagine believing everything is true. Someone can make any claim about anything, even things that didn’t happen, that are untrue. Taking false things as truth warps our perception and understanding of reality. This is why it’s important to categorize belief and truth separately and know how to use these words to structure out knowledge and understanding of reality and what is true or not.

When you accept a belief as truth, you have put your faith and trust in it, and become loyal to it. You become attached and bound to it as what is real. It becomes a part of the building blocks to construct a worldview and self-view. Some are so ingrained that they are the foundation. Removing some beliefs is like destroying a person’s world or themselves by destroying the basis for how they think about the world and/or themselves.
What we need to be bound to is truth. Desires, wants and wishes for beliefs to be true puts those beliefs above what is true. Then we fail to recognize what is true and believe what is untrue.

We can have trust, faith and loyalty in a person. Their actions that garner such trust, faith and loyalty from us. We can believe in them, have faith in them, and champion for them, fight with and for them and stand by their side. Through interaction with them we come to know them by their actions.
It’s not wise to have complete trust, faith and loyalty in someone unless we get to know them first for them to demonstrate a worthiness, a trustworthiness; that they are worthy of our trust, faith and loyalty in them. The demonstrable truth of their objective actions and behaviors is what we use in our application of trust, faith and loyalty to them. We trust that others won’t harm us because they have demonstrated a certain capacity or level of consciousness to us so far. Some people garner more trust, loyalty and faith from us, and some people garner less trust, loyalty and faith.

We judge people by their demonstrable actions. The persistence of their behavior is what engenders trust in them. They could alter their behavior at any time to harm us, to betray us. But their repeated pattern of behavior provides a track record, a history that demonstrates what they are likely to continue to do.

We can be betrayed by misplacing trust, loyalty, faith or belief in someone. The same can apply to the information we believe. It’s worse when you put your faith, trust and become loyally attached to a belief, as the betrayal is more damaging to your psyche. Having faith, trust and loyalty to an idea or belief, does not constitute it as a truth in existence. Making a belief a rock in our foundation can lead to building a house of cards that comes crashing down.


Source

We can have beliefs as speculative potentials or possibilities, until they are proven wrong. Maybe we can modify a hypothesis, idea or belief to potentially demonstrate or prove it to be accurate, right and true. But if we can’t prove it, then it’s not demonstrably true. It could eventually be verified to be true, but until then, don’t put that much weight into it to make it a part of your foundation.

We can develop theories, such as in theoretical physics. Eventually down the line, decades later, or more, we can develop technology that can verify and prove the existence of a theory. Or disprove it. A sound and rational theory can be pursued, but we should realize that it could be bogus and be ready to abandon it so as to not waste time.

Bertrand Russell had a theory, a paradox, and tried to resolve it for years. He eventually gave up on it. He was attached to an idea, a belief, and wanted to make it true. We have to know when quit while we’re ahead, and learn to let go of beliefs we put so much weight into. Ideas, concepts and beliefs can captivate us because of the trust, loyalty and faith that we place into them. Beliefs are very powerful. We can get very attached to beliefs because we don’t want them to be wrong.

This is one of the large problems in the world. We just want to believe whatever we want to believe, especially with postmodernism, subjectivism and solipsism pervading. Many don’t have an accurate understanding of the difference between truth and falsity, and the difference between truth and belief. There is so much confusion pervading, that we are just believing whatever we want to believe because we think in postmodernist, subjectivist and solipsistic ways; that we can simply believe whatever we want and it’s just as valid as anyone else believing whatever they want. That way, everything simply becomes belief and opinion and there is no more truth. This is how confused and lost much of the population is, unable to think properly.

Sort:  

Upon challenging beliefs we inherited from our parents, culture, or society in general, we can find our minds akin to a game of Jenga. I suffered terrible grief when I realized that things I would have - that I did - stake my life on, were utterly false.

While the horror of realizing everything I had worked all my life for was a lie was unalloyed agony, that was a price I paid for constructive criticism. The truth I bought with that suffering I would never relinquish. It is why I diligently seek criticism today: so that I can discard false beliefs before I invest decades of work in, pledge my faith to, and defend with my life scurrilous lies.

Nothing is more valuable than reality.

Thanks!

Yes, we should all want to be right, for the sake of avoiding what's wrong, not faulty arrogance of thinking we're right just to feel good about being right ;)

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

Interesting post. I think that too often people tend to get swayed by charm and a certain allure of trustworthiness that some people know to fake really well. Politicians are a fine example. But as you said, checking the background and past behavior is vital. Past behavior is a great indicator of what that person really is. Words can lure you into many traps of perception, but actions are a clear sign. I remember reading somewhere it is quite interesting to do once in a while an experiment and act like you are in a mute movie : you can't hear the words, you only pay attention to what people do. It works amazing if practiced often.

Information perceived as a truth is cluttered along the way with emotional attachment, sympathy, associations with what we believe it's right. Sometimes people, leaders, made good choices which were unpopular, unloved, because people embrace familiarity much often than novelty. Therefore they indeed reject the pain of having to let go to an idea, to admit their own failure at judging one matter. Even if they might have a hunch they embraced the wrong idea, most will follow through until the end only to not lose self esteem. Unfortunately, people fail to realize, on a mass level, that admitting one's flaw judgement and replacing with it a better one, closer to reality and truth, is not a sign of weakness, but of strenght. Of progress

Observation is key. Words can be untrue. Actions speak louder than words. The goal is maa kheru, to be be true of voice, where your words align with your actions.

The stubbornness and saving face to continue along the wrong path is foolishness. It's better to know as soon as possible when a wrong turn has been made in order to course correct the mistake, to admit "I was wrong".

The alignment of words with actions. That is quite a worthy goal to have and achieve!

I'm encountering a similar principle in genealogy. A lot of amateurs make the mistake of assuming their beliefs about ancestors are facts, and build a family tree based on their assumptions. But each linkage in the tree is vital. The chain (of ancestry) is only as strong as its weakest link. If Joe didn't really come from Mary and Bill, then even if you're related to Joe, you aren't (closely) related to Mary or Bill... or any of their ancestors. Some people build a family tree of cards, taking beliefs as truths, and forming a false view of who/where/how they came from. My strategy, then, is to start from myself and build backward, to my parents, and their parents, and THEIR parents, etc, but only proceeding back in time if I have documents and/or photos and/or personal memories and/or reliable firsthand info from relatives.

A professional genealogist I met recently told me "in genealogy, information is either properly sourced, or it is mythology". Assumptions are beliefs, and even though they might be true, building upon them is foolish.

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

And so it is with history in general. Genealogy is a good demonstration of how it applies to all of the past.

I'll just have to offer an apology in advance - for plagiarizing parts of your recent writings....

Great posts, matey.

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

True this...we're at a crossroads as a species...sadly 99% have never heard of Bertrand Russell, let alone understand logic. Being a father of a three-year-old daughter, I have no idea what the future has in store.

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

Teach her well :)

The Russel Paradox

Let R = {S such that S is not a member of S}
Now is R in itself?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell-paradox/#RPCL

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

Hehe, thanks, I didn't remember what it was, and didn't bother to look it up for reference ;)

everything simply becomes belief and opinion and there is no more truth

This is really striking! I think truths remain as truths until they're disproven. But I think you're right about beliefs. We can't do away with them because we have to make sense of our world no matter what and that means clinging to any form of belief that we can.

It's the other way around. The burden of proof is on the claim being made. If you make a claim of truth, the burden lies with that claim.

Don't forget to use a VPN when browsing online.