I don't call them conspiracy "theories" myself, unless it's generally in the framework of rejecting it - using the term as a way to highlight actual conspiracies that were once dismissed as craziness, as well as in the form of irony.

It's the establishment backed thinkers/debunking/gate-keeping types that do that as a way to hide their real crimes (yes crimes against humanity!). All we are doing is using that term against them as way to discredit their own debunking and "theories", that we are the actual conspiracy "theorists" ourselves. Conspiracy theorising is not an unusual or illogical thing to do anyway. That's is how actual crimes are solved - and why so many people are charged with conspiracy (mostly against the state, but not the other way around in a lot of cases). You can't uncover a conspiracy without actually theorising and/or collecting scientific data to back up your "theory" of a conspiracy taking place.

I completely agree that crimes and war crimes against humanity are in themselves conspiracies, because many of them were conceived and planned out by the conspirators before they actually took place. That is the very definition of a conspiracy, so using that term is appropriate in those cases (in conjunction with the terms of war crimes and any other crimes or corruption in general).

I don't think we should necessarily get too hung up on this (even though I completely understand your point on a fundamental level and agree with it). I think it's too late to change most of the average peoples minds (due to decades of deliberate attacks and propaganda in defence of real conspiracies) on that in general and the collection and spreading of truthful information is a lot more important than anything else. Most people can't be forced into anything either - they must transform themselves through a self-awakening process....that's why verifiable information is king. If it's out there, then that process will take place for whoever is open to it in a non-partisan way.

If you go back and look at previous deepdives article that others and myself in this community produced, you can see that in most cases they were produced in the form of investigative journalism with the use of real and verifiable documents that can show real evidence that a "conspiracy" took place, or there was overwhelming evidence of crimes against humanity perpetrated by the state.

That's what I have always concentrated on myself. Real documents and real data to show that it wasn't just a "theory", without anything to back up the article produced.

That title is not promoting the term "conspiracy theory" itself, but rather re-inforcing the fact that real conspiracies that were considered just crazy "theories", have been confirmed and can be verified with real evidence and documents that it was indeed a conspiracy (or high level corruption/crime against humanity).