Correct. I think I may have confused these numbers because the one study from NY said there were 30% positive. I think the point of the article I mentioned was that there are ancestors for SARS-CoV2 which many people already have antibodies for, meaning that the novel nature of it is called into question. More than likely it mutated from something we already have circulating through the population that previously may have been identified as a cold or flu based on symptoms.