Yeah, let's behave like those two things are comparable.
Like, Corona + G5 have as much to do with each other as Homosexuality with Veganism.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, let's behave like those two things are comparable.
Like, Corona + G5 have as much to do with each other as Homosexuality with Veganism.
You said that. Which is wrong. I was giving an example of how willfully ignorant that type of thinking is. You don't know if there is causation until you keep looking to prove or disprove it.
The 5G and COVID topic is heated, and if there was nothing there, then people could be shown to leave it alone. What's the rush with rolling out 5G when hardly any device uses it? Turn it off for a bit, show that the correlation was just that and the case is closed and people who espouse 5g=covid won't have a leg to stand on.
Good idea, how about we stop vaccinating for 10 years to see if the death count goes up significantly again. Or, how about we turn off electricity and see if cancer is correlated to that.
Or better, let's turn off internet for a time to see if that is somehow related to crimes.
Or, we could leave science to scientists and stop spreading shit we got no idea about.
The author of the study published it, and I wrote about it. Yeah, stop talking about things and questioning what we're told is or isn't possible. Great plan. Obey.
That's not at all what I am saying. But spreading correlations without discussing AT ALL that there are 100000 explanations that are 10000 times more likely to cause this correlation that actually being a causation is manipulating people to believe stupid stuff.
Just stop strawmanning. You want to dig into stuff, do it, research it well, make experiments. Read scientific papers. Buy lab equipment. Do whatever you want. And when you got conclusive evidence present it.
But don't read 15 blogs where no one has any scientific evidence at all and then manipulate a bunch of idiots to believe some crazy theories you came up from the questionable blog articles.
Ice cream sales correlate strongly with murder. Shouldn't we ban ice cream for a while to make sure?
So a guy, who has a Bachelor in Biology from 1970, that has worked since then as an Artist (Painter) put together a little pdf with some info he got from wikipedia and that's what you call a "published study"?
I call this utter bullshit.
Btw, how does he explain Brazil having so high numbers without a G5 net?
Obviously, not explaining it at all.
Edit: This is not how science works.