Changing the negative vote to positive does not solve the problem, it brings more problems. Talking to Dave on his post, I thought the issue was who was behind the vote, not the vote itself. But apparently, after changing the vote, is everything okay? Is it all resolved? Soon, I realize that the real reason for the vote discussion is the proposal itself and not the person behind the vote. That's regrettable. Congratulations to everyone involved in ending the Wild mode in the next few days. If it's to end bots, it has to be done in both modes, not just moving bots to one mode.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah.. it's pretty funny how when the Head of the SPS DAO Foundation votes the way he wants, a no, it's a travesty and people want to burn down the world... but now that he's changed his vote to a yes in order to appease others, everything's fine.
or the fact that he had voted in many other proposals without a peep from the bots for me but not bots for thee crowd
I can only assume you mean me since I've seen you making these points in multiple places. You are free of course to say anything you want.
At least I have the balls to address people I have issues with directly. And I give them an opportunity to respond and clarify. Which you do not, you just prefer to undermine behind someone's back and hope you don't have to confront them.
But its ok, keep making your points. All it will do is encourage people like me to leave. Whether you realize it or not, I try to help. But if you don't like the message then you try to tear down the messenger from the shadows.
Just remember you WILL succeed in running people off with your words, and I'm sure you will be happy when you see who they are. You can take pride that you were a big reason for it.
I will say I'm very disappointed to see you act this way, but you are not the first person that I underestimated in my life.
I didn't mention who I was talking about on purpose, because it refers to many people who have been this way, I have no idea why you are attacking me personally, unless you feel guilty of this. Still, you are personally attacking me now and I feel that's wrong in and of itself. You have the balls, because you are acting like a dick by attacking people...
I can only assume you are speaking of me when you say "votes the way he wants, a no".
Unlike you @torran, I directly talked to Aly. I directly mentioned what my issues with him were, why I thought how I thought, and what I felt was important. Then I pushed for him to be heard. I encouraged him to face the community and address his perspective.
But that's not your style. You do not have courage to do that. Instead you simply make up things so you can tear down someone that worked against what you felt was more important.
Also you should get your facts straight, I still have the same problems with what was originally said, and the only thing that has happened is they have been addressed by Aly. Because I did IN FACT gave him a chance to address them. That's how grown-ups handle things. You should try it, it will work I promise.
So I don't give a shit if he changed his vote or not. That was not the point of my post or what I had a problem with. I care that he didn't listen to what 2/3rds of the community was saying, and didn't engage with us before casting a blocking vote.
So I'm happy he did engage, and I'm happy he listened. That's what I'm happy about. His vote was not an issue, the fact that he is the Head of the SPS DAO Foundation and he listened to the SPS holders was.
Too bad you are so clouded in your desire to get what you want that you can't even see when people are trying to help and support the community.
Pitiful.
It was actually a blanket statement speaking to the overall response from the community as witnessed throughout tavern, but thanks for the personal attack. Real stand up guy, Dave.
I just apologized for my misreading of it below. But I will say it again here. I was wrong.
And regarding the personal attack, I apologize for saying you weren't grown up for addressing me directly. That was an attack. And because I was wrong in my reading of your comment, then I definitely attacked you unfairly.
I withdraw my statements that you were not handling it in a grown up manner, assaulted your style, and questioned your courage; because you were just generalizing your frustration instead of leveling it against one person. My response was inappropriate given you were just blowing off steam in general, not directing them at a single individual.
I am sorry for this as well.
Finally you are right that my statements are not defendable. I accept that in your eyes that I wasn't a "stand up guy".
Thank you for letting me know the truth and I regret that I did read it wrong and unfairly respond.
Also... "votes the way he wants, a no," could also be read, votes the way Aly wants, a no. Reading comprehension is hard though. Sorry you felt so attacked.
I interpreted it the other way. I apologize to you for misreading who you meant when you said "he".
I was wrong and I'm sorry for my misreading it.
Bad assumption. Sorry you didn't ask me and just assumed I was happy now that he changed his vote. If you would've asked, I would've told you I was happy that he got involved with the community and understood its importance. I would've also told you I was happy that he recognized he should communicate with the community if he ever has a blocking vote when a proposal has 2/3rds of the vote of the community.
But you didn't ask. Its ok though, you don't have to understand. Its your right to do so!