Probably worth mentioning @hivewatchers as taking payment in upvotes for their work. Not ideal but it is what it is.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Probably worth mentioning @hivewatchers as taking payment in upvotes for their work. Not ideal but it is what it is.
Ideally, there should be a proposal to fund @hivewatchers, but I think the prevalent thinking here is it wouldn't get passed.
It does seem strange to be simultaneously preventing exploitation of the reward pool while dipping your hands in it.
It's the same with the good works of @jaguar.force as well. But, I guess, again, it's the perception that it wouldn't get funded. Hmm, maybe there should be a try at the proposal anyhow.
I'd like to see some proposals from both, what have they got to lose?
I'm not sure on the total pending rewards Hivewatchers remove each week, any idea if it's around the total they take in payouts?
I guess you'd have to query that based on the downvotes they dish out.
Currently, they do receive more than $2 per comment and $30 per report. They also do curate community content as well.
"curate".
"curate" in name alone
Never mind the shitposting farming by the old time farmers taking a majority of rewards but ""respected"" ""curators"" are voting posts with clear copyright infringement clearly not even looking.
Fundementaly Flawed.
Somebody should get on that, 10sbd prices me out.
Part of me feel that things need to be thought out before writing an actual proposal.
So, I'm just testing the waters with @dpoll right now. Just gauging interest.
With any luck,...