The idea of using a system to tackle another system is relatable and achievable when no one can be pointed to be the pioneer of the revolution.
This is how terrorists groups strive, the book haram, the Islamic groups and all the others who have gone before them still strive to date because they have a system people believe in.
When they attack or carry out their plans you only see the results and not the main people involved. In war there will definitely be casualties, the thing is people are not afraid to die or fight, they are just afraid to die for nothing.
There's nothing as powerful as a believe system of change. If a system of good is created to fight the authorities in government, their first step will be to kill, but when the realize that the people are not afraid of dieing and the people show strength by being more clinical and tactical than they anticipated they would be forced to re strategize and start looking for whatever is fueling the people's belief. If they can't get that, they are very close to losing power.
I will always say, power is a myth, it's only where people decide it to be. The people can take power from the government, but taking power means controlling the narrative. To do that the people must first slowly take control of everything that can be used to hurt the masses. Shut out the re-enforcement power of the government and make them look like a joke with no one person coming out to say I am the one leading this revolution, no way to track what's financing the revolution, and at the end of the day no one to bring down for sponsoring such revolution.
I agree. However, once power is given to the hands of those who know well to use it, they utilize it to the extent where it becomes arduous to get that power back. A series of struggle is needed.
Hmmmmmm. Those who stood against SARS had a pioneer?? I just heard of what happened to protestors but no idea about how the campaign was launched.
Does it mean that the people should plan out things hiding themselves? Even then, if the master minds making people collect on a system are hidden, is it possible to carry out plans without the upfront warriors?
I am just trying to understand how is it possible to implement a system against another strong system without coming to the front and facing the horrible consequences in the beginning of the struggle.
Thanks for taking your time to respond.
!LUV
@kilvnrex, @amberkashif(1/4) sent you LUV. | tools | discord | community | HiveWiki | <>< daily
Yes they had pioneers, celebrities who sponsored the campaign, falz for example who was one of those at the forefront.
What made the end SARS revolution end was when the government ordered that the accounts of those celebrities be froven making it hard for them to access their funds.
The government isn't the president. The president is the man the people knows to be in power. The real cabals are not known and the president carry out their bids. These are the people who influence power in government.
So to fight people you do not know, you must first be hidden else if they know you they can hurt you in ways you can't begin to imagine.
There must always be upfront warriors, these are the people the government will tackle first, the people who will carry out the will of the new system.
But then anyone can be an upfront warrior, even a mad man. In a game of strategy there are always those we see and those we don't. For example, if knowing that the government sends funds to certain accounts for protection, an upfront warrior might be the ICT personnel in the bank whose job is to divert those funds and turn the people the government pays for protection into an enemy making those people another upfront warrior who would fight the government based on a miscommunication that was created. Again it's a game of strategy.
Hmmm. I understand your point of view now.
So you mean that protests and voices dhould not be random with a strategy backed by a mindset ?