Another thing in case he had generated it with artificial intelligence , neither has the right to ban the publication, since the community rules do not say anything about it and less sanction publications of drawings made in pencil , I do not see it fair, unless the rules are by taste. Thank you very much , big disappointment
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
AI-generated art is NOT original art.
It was not clearly mentioned in the post that the art is not original and was created by AI.
It means that it was dishonestly published in a way that would deceive the reader to think that it was created by you.
There is a tiny mention of ibisPaint but hardly any reader would know what ibisPaint is, and that is a tool that auto generates art.
But if the reader does not know what IbisProt is, it is not my fault, I mention it, just because you do not know the law does not mean that you are exempt from its application, so I do not see any reason why I mention it, if the reader does not know, he should investigate and research and another thing that made me very indignant was that he demonetized the pencil sketch I made.
https://hive.blog/ai/@hivewatchers/ai-generated-content-not-original-content