Thank-you for the response.
In the image, you showed someone using multiple commands.
Each command is for a different token. That means the poster has bought/staked/saved for each of those tokens in order to use the commands. What is wrong with that? Isn't the idea of a token for people to collect and USE them? Isn't that what the issuer wants? Do you expect that people should sell all but ONE token and use JUST THAT ONE?

Honestly, I really don't get this whole idea of having to post each command on its own. Instead of encouraging the use of these tokens, it discourages their use, and that seems counter-productive to me. That would be like telling everyone NOT to use HIVE and just stick with BTC.

These tokens need to be USED to be seen and adopted by others. Otherwise, why issue the token in the first place? AND even more important is the fact that these tokens can be altered after they have been issued! What kind of 'contract' do we have where the issuer can unilaterally change the contract at will? How can anyone have trust in a token that can be altered any time after it has been issued? That goes against all the principals of immutability and blockchains in general.