Who killed Charlie Kirk ? Part-2

in Freewriters10 days ago

Now, one foot-pound of force is the amount of effort it takes to lift one pound, one foot in the air against gravity. So, this bullet is being delivered with 2300 pounds of force. Now, normally you see in a movie the guy gets shot and he flies off of his horse. That doesn't happen because it's traveling 2300 feet per second and it just passes right through the body, but on the way through it's creating this enormous shock wave. It's a temporary wound cavity and coming in in the space of a neck when it comes out the backside and it would come out the backside.

I don't want to hear that his bones were steel and it was a miracle that that's just crazy talk. Within that distance of his neck, it would make a hole out the backside, probably about the size of a softball. I'm sorry, a tennis ball. Now, there's a big white banner behind him, and there's no mark on it. There's no splatter. And if you look at Gary's videos, you will see them shooting a pork butt roast. And you look at the amount of splatter that comes out of the backside of that. It's enormous. So that we're told there's no exit wound. How? Well, that one of the suppositions then is well, he was wearing some kind of body armor. Okay. Do you know what happens to somebody that's wearing body armor that has to absorb the force of 2300 pounds of pressure? He would get blown back off that chair. But that doesn't happen. And my question about this body armor thing is I've seen videos after video.

I've studied them frame by frame by frame. There is no evidence of impact. If you get hit and that body armor is absorbing the force, you would see some effect of that. There would be a big hole in his shirt. You'd see the trauma of that right there. So then they say, "Well, you know, it hit up here somewhere and it glanced up and that was what this little thing was." Well, we're told that his vertebra was penetrated from C2 way up at the top all the way down through I think it said C7 or something like that, right down to the base of his upper back and the bullet was lodged there. And there was fragments. What kind of .300-six does that? So the discussion is well gee maybe maybe it hit the body armor right here and it glanced upwards. So I did some research. That's why I'm a research geek. I saw a couple of videos of some guys that were trying to replicate this and they took a mannequin. They put some body armor on him and they made a shot so it would hit up high right up here. Right up here on the body armor. Not blunt force right in the middle, but up high so it would glance. It eviscerated the neck and head of that mannequin. I mean, it exploded like you've seen probably some of these pictures of watermelons getting hit by bullets. The skull and everything on this mannequin just went everywhere. And yet we see no evidence of that in this video ensemble of what happened to Charlie Kirk. It just none of this makes any sense. I don't have an answer. I just got a lot of questions. So the ballistics didn't make sense to me. The next piece is within about I don't know minutes the security team presumably are leaping and jumping over the tables gathering the cameras and the SIM cards. They're removing evidence from the crime scene.

How weird is that? Why would they do that? Now somebody said, "Well, they said, "Well, we were trying to make sure it stayed safe." Well, good then, bonehead. Why don't you stick around there and make sure that nobody tampers with it instead of you tampering with it? I'm not buying it. That's BS. So, the next thing that bugs me is remember it's like a week is going by and I'm not making this video yet cuz you know I've got some expertise but mostly it's secondhand and I write books and you know I don't have that kind of credibility. I wasn't a Marine Scout sniper and I wasn't a ballistics expert. But I take all of that information from those guys and I create these scenarios and I would never write a scenario like this. It just doesn't make any sense. So the next thing that really bugs me and I'm probably a horrible person. You know, you're going to agree with me. You know I am. But within a week everybody's moving on. We've got our guy. 33 hours he surrenders. This is our guy.

We've analyzed all of the different information and this is him and everybody's moving on. We're holding a big media event.