It tends to be my habit to read more than write, because days go by too quickly when I get involved in written discussions. Especially when it comes to complex discussions like design of a stable coin. Often these discussions come up at times when I'm busy with other work, and if I get embroiled in them, it can cause a severe distraction. Interruptions during the middle of coding can have unfortunate side effects, I've found.
When I've had some time, I'll complete and share my ideas about improvements to HBD, some of which have already been suggested by others in the past.
I really appreciate that you've taken some of your time in your reply and feel very honoured for it. I think that edicted himself was skeptical about the possibility to at least discuss this changes on the blockchain as he stated on his post.
In my post one of the things I pointed out about the advantages of Leo over Hive is that is a centralized formula is easier to have one person involved than a lot of witnesses and stakeholders. This is mainly a communication problem because if you want to suggest changes who you should be talking to?. I guess that you are a good candidate for it because you listened us :).
This experience renewes my good feelings about Hive
Will be looking forward for this. Thank you very much and Hive on!.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta