Although I do not have enough Hive at the moment, if we were considering hypothetical scenarios, I would consider withdrawing a certain amount of Hive to acquire materials or resources. With these, I could realize a self-sustaining project that would provide me with food and plants for my health care.

The remaining Hive I would use to curate content on the platform and, if possible, support projects that are beneficial to people's lives with my vote. I think I would allocate very little for leisure, as most of my free time is based on reading, writing and listening to music. . Although I would love to have more time to play guitar, it is not a priority for now.

On the subject of decentralization, I think this is an area where many scenarios can be envisioned. However, it seems innate to generate a process of centralization that can have variable durations when it reaches a limit that can be unsustainable. We can see examples of this in history, in society and even on the Internet.

So, it is natural that in any system, including Hive, centralization processes are generated. In my opinion, considering a hypothetical scenario of hundreds of thousands of publications per day, one way to mitigate centralization is to create communities that manage to segment a large number of publications per day. I believe that AI-assisted text mining would save a lot of time and work without being biased to the detriment of ordinary users.

In Hive there are users who generate very good quality content. I stay a couple of hours a day reading them to clear my mind a bit.