You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: G-dog's engagement experiment results

in OCD4 years ago

I'm a direct dude in real life here, not so much, but yes, I did consider something like that went the soft option instead.

It was a really interesting experiment. Unfortunately it won't make any difference. I've spoken about it off chain with a few but in the end it will end up making no difference...Except to how I view (and vote) those who didn't do the the right thing by a new account, despite what they say they do for the community and new users.

Thanks for commenting on the old (sneaky) G-dogs experiment. 🙂

Sort:  

I think I was always safe, I'm not the most engaged when it comes to comments, most of mine are quite short.

I think that's just me and comments in general thought.

I do at least acknowledge people who say more than 'great post'.

Depressing to say that despite that I've won prizes recently in Asher's League!

It was a great idea for an experiment! It really did need a more deserving title though!

Let's give this a try....

!ENGAGE 30

Gawd, now I see myself having to do another experiment just so I can deploy a more hard-hitting title on it! 😂

Sometimes engagement isn't possible for many reasons. At the moment, probably since last October, I've done a lot of it and it's possible for me to do so, but that may change at some stage. I get it, people get busy.

What I don't like...People presenting themselves as something but in reality being the opposite. I have a file in my noggin reserved for people like that.

I spoke with Asher and two others who knew what I was doing, and the account from which I was doing it and maybe if I did it again I'd involved him more (tracking stats) as if he has anything else to do! 🤔

You can be head of the Titling department.

Thanks for the ENGAGE, much appreciated.

I really appreciate your discretion over this btw - defo best to not call people out - the data's there - so word will get around - no need to name and shame - unless they start to sell themselves on 'engagement'.

Titling - I've never come across that term before!

BTW check this out - the amount of raw data involved in working out curation returns on one post - you'll recognize the poster I'm sure!

http://scot-api.steem-engine.com/@tarazkp/how-does-curation-work-on-hive-what-are-the-rules-posting-and-voting-limits?hive=1

Yeah, I wasn't sure about the word...

Maybe, title-ing? Fuck it, it's Sunday morning, near enough is good enough.

Yes, I would never call someone out as it would affect their account but I think people will get what they deserve, good or bad, over time.

That Taraz guy...Something wrong with him...Seems dodgy. 😂

It's Sunday morning here too...

20200621_012519.jpg

I think I just found a new way of gaming @abh12345's league.

Perhaps you could make Taraz head of 'dodging'.

I actually thought you meant 'Tilting' as in tilting towards a better system - the concept of 'title' didn't even register without the 'E' - it's a tricky thing language!

Seems like you're all Peroni'd up...I only count 6 though...Where'd you hide the other 4? Lol.

The English language is dumb...But it is all I know how to write.

Titleing isn't right I think. Titling seems legit but could be wrong. Both have tit in them though so...Maybe they're both good? 😂

Oh the other 6 are in the recycling

re-titling - that's the word!

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.