Posts with rewards set to burn still pay curators.
Only author rewards are burned.
If you think this type of content should be eligible for author rewards, make your voice heard in this discord: https://discord.gg/t4VRHD8MXt.
Thanks for your support.
Apoyo a los que vienen llegando ..es bueno para impulsar la red Hive
What are you referring to here? Are these posts the ones that are set to decline payout? I think it's a great feature there are some times when I want to just share something from someone else outside of hive and I get accused of plagiarism by sharing something that I'm not saying I did. And that is the nature of Hive that you know you post something and it gets popular and you get a payout for it and you're considered the author because you posted it but maybe you're not the author and you're just trying to share it from outside hive and so I declined payout means that the author doesn't get rewards but as a curator who is sharing it and voting it up I can vote it up and I can still get creation rewards for something that I just share that's good
IF you set your rewards to burn, you can post most anything you want.
Setting a beneficiary to null does the same thing.
Self voting is seen as greedy and is subject to downvoting.
As is making two posts, one in english and the other in another language.
The community custom is to combine them and downvote any that don't.
Selling hive now is like selling 3usd btc.
I don't sell food because of the flame that happens and it kind of defeats the idea of voting to give rewards. It is actually a concern that we we could be flagged even if you set your rewards to refuse payment because the flag or may not notice that you set your beneficiary to know or you set your rewards to no payment and they see a cell phone well they might flag you. At my website proof of brain.blog you can set it up to see whether they sell voted what rewards that they chose and it's very obvious all these things it's a good place for curating