You two need to table your talking points ahead of production this is really just ramblings/bed talk.

I can't believe I would say this...
But @theycallmedan actually sounds like the educated one and the actual sexologist is struggling with her two minds... and failing at finding neutrality.

Anyway I had to stop listening because the GENDER REVEAL turned into a political debate and not a very interesting one.

If these podcasts are to be successful you need to really up the intellectual dialogue. A sexologist can provide great insight but will always fail at common sense.

For example...
BONOBO MONKEYS.
What does a sexologist have to say about the interaction between their species? Is sexual interaction between an adult and a child ever going to make sense to us humans who consider that not just morally wrong but illegal too. Yet their social structure is actually what modern western societies are trying to emulate:
MATRIARCHAL, SEXUAL IDENTITY/INTERACTION PARAMOUNT.

Finally the sexologist made a point of not wanting to label people... OK.

What is LGBTQI+ then?

Not only is it labeling people but segregating them into an ACRONYM and then placing them into even more constricting labels in accordance with their orientation.

So essentially saying:
YOU ARE JUST A LETTER.

Really...?
Tat's a healthy society?
Is that the height of "correctness"?

The outcomes of such idiocy are what you two then present... A GENDER REVEAL that quickly descends into a clusterfuck of viewpoints that don't even know what the starting point was and in an attempt to "not offend" the discussion quickly falls off the academic table.

Anyway if you want these podcasts to be popular you got to step it up. Or not... because really even if nobody listens Dan got that juicy vote on it.

Hey maybe I'll start my own AnalSex & Crypto talk. Will you vote for it Dan?