You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Regulator or Maffia - The Financial Conduct Authority - Nikhil Rathi

in Actifit5 days ago

Shut Down Wilson & Roe (Illegal Bailiffs) - Campaign Webinar 20 – The FCA Connection

Anthony Badaloo
London, ENG, United Kingdom
9 Dec 2025
Shut Down Wilson & Roe (Illegal Bailiffs) - Campaign Webinar 20 – The FCA Connection

Summary of the Church Hill Finance / FCA Register Issues This video explains the ongoing problems with my FCA record and why I’m asking the FCA for clarification, correction, and filing with the Court of Appeal. Case Ref: 210935849 | Court of Appeal: A3/2017/1316 Firm: Church Hill Finance (FCA Ref 402188)

What the FCA already confirmed: On 23 October 2025, the FCA confirmed that the Final Notice and Decision Notice against me and Church Hill Finance were removed from publication. What still needs resolving:

  1. FCA’s 2020 Public Statement The FCA stated on 30 December 2020 that no disciplinary action existed against me. With the Notices withdrawn, I’m asking for written confirmation that no findings, sanctions, or restrictions remain.

  2. The alleged “trespass conviction” was impossible The Notices relied on an allegation that I was convicted of “trespass” on 01/04/2015 at my own home, where I was the registered proprietor. Courts later confirmed: – No conviction – No prosecution – No accuser – No sealed order Every court contacted (Harrow Crown, Hendon, Willesden, Barnet, Probation) confirmed the same: no conviction exists.

  3. Determinations made without verifying the basic facts The FCA, the Complaints Commissioner and the Upper Tribunal all acted as if a conviction existed. None verified it, and none were able to produce a sealed order or prosecution file.

  4. No lawful accuser In the police interview, PC Benjamin Kovler said “the police” made the allegation. A police force cannot be the complainant in such a case, and no individual accuser has ever been identified.

  5. Unlawful enforcement actions triggered by the allegation Because the FCA’s publication presented the allegation as fact, a chain of harmful events followed: – Arrest on a non-existent warrant (dismissed in court) – Illness in custody – Forced debt demands from dormant enforcement companies – Violent bailiff actions – Written apologies from police forces who relied on the FCA data Video evidence and full documents are linked in the description.

  6. Criminality inside the professional network around my case Several individuals and firms involved in my conveyancing, property matters and safeguarding were later jailed, struck off or shut down: – Solicitor Anthony Maragh – Estate agent Sunny Vij – Child protection officers Cadek & Maitland – Axiom Ince (shut down; directors on fraud charges) – Counterfeit High Court writ naming the Lord Chancellor as “witness” – Struck-off bailiff Christopher Phantis – Property fraud conviction at Wood Green Crown Court involving misuse of my company data These events show the wider environment was saturated with forged documents and misconduct, making proper FCA verification essential.

  7. Issues during FCA investigations I faced two years of pressure, including false forgery accusations, unlawful charges on my property, and individuals convincing police they were court bailiffs using counterfeit writs.

  8. Direct financial harm Because the FCA Register still shows me as unauthorised: – AJ Bell / Sippdeal won’t allow me to act on my own pension or my son’s. – Clients relying on FCA-published information suffered repossessions, account freezes, violence by dormant enforcement companies, and financial losses.

  9. My current professional roles I continue lawfully as a Trading Standards Practitioner, Accountant, Estate Planner, Auditor, Financial Coach and provider of commercial and due-diligence services. These do not require FCA authorisation.

  10. What I am asking the FCA to provide: – Confirmation that no disciplinary findings remain – Dates the Notices were removed – Correction of the FCA Register wording – Filing of the FCA’s 23 October 2025 letter with the Court of Appeal – A written clarification for third parties – An explanation of how unverified information was published – Assurance that further harm will be prevented Suggested wording for third-party confirmation: “On 23 October 2025, the FCA confirmed that the Final Notice and Decision Notice relating to Anthony Badaloo and Church Hill Finance (FCA No. 402188) were removed from publication. The FCA holds no active disciplinary findings, sanctions or restrictions in respect of Mr Badaloo or Church Hill Finance.” Request for future correspondence: Use FCA letterhead, include an authorised signature, and correctly record my address (180 Church Hill Road).

Get Involved: Petition:
www.ScamBuster.TV

Donate:
https://bit.ly/homesavers

YouTube:
https://youtube.com/@scambustertv999
Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/anthonybadaloo
Twitter:

https://twitter.com/BadalooAnthony
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/anthonybad

Telegram:
https://t.me/ZxmFUi1U4GM4ZjNk
Odysee:
https://bit.ly/eds100x
Blurt:

https://blurt.blog/@tonybad
T

Shut Down Wilson & Roe (Illegal Bailiffs) - Campaign Webinar 20 – The FCA Connection
ags: #Justice #Privacy #Wealth #Crime #Bitcoin #Freedom #CryptoFi #Petition #ScamBusterTV #Survivor2020