You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Male Circumcision : is it beneficial or poses more risk?

in StemSocial2 years ago

What percentage of people have an infection after surgery?

It's not everything that nature puts that are useful in the body.. I hope you are aware.

The appendix is one.

An umbilical hernia is another.

There are a lot of things that you can come up with in nature that might need some form of reconstruction.

Phimosis, balanitis and the likes are not a good experience.

The fact that there is increased risk of his an increased risk of things settling within the foreskin is questionable.

Moving forward, you will probably say that I might also support female circumcision. I do not and the reason is the clitoris is separated from the vagina and so can't get easily infected.

However, the penis goes into the vagina which is a home for a lot of organisms and so makes it more scientific and more beneficial to be circumcised as a male.

As I said, I've nothing against not being circumcised.

I have seen a lot of men who are not circumcised and have not had any complications.

I sincerely love your analogies