You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Subconscious Social Engineering - A Concerning Interpretation of Current Events on Hive - HDF 124 Operator Ethics Questioned

in StemSocial4 years ago

@montycashmusic @frot voting for the return proposal is something we can do immediately to raise the standard for funding to be approved. Proposals with less support than the return proposal do not get funded.

Sort:  

Excuse my ignorance, how exactly does one vote for the return proposal? My 1000 odd HP will be but a drop but lots of drops make an ocean.

Ok, I found the proposal DHF 124, (btw, your title of this post says 'HDF'). It relates specifically to HiveWatchers.

Look at me, I'm learning new things.

5tupid question time - How exactly is user 'logic' involved with HiveWatchers?

The Hive Decentralized Fund, Decentralized Hive Fund, same diff lol

Do you think that taking it out on other people who have proposals up by inflating the bar is the moral thing to do? Do those people not deserve any funding just because some random person on the internet called you a name?

Do you think that taking it out on other people who have proposals up by inflating the bar is the moral thing to do?

  • No
  • That is not the purpose of the return proposal, i was going to elaborate, but thats not what this post is about

Do those people not deserve any funding just because some random person on the internet called you a name?

  • Accusations of hate crimes are not the same as an ad-hominem subjecture
  • If they want my vote, making blind accusations of me is not a good way to achieve that

While we are on the off topic quesitons...

Do you think someone who misrepresents logical thinking should be involved with community funded development pertaining to spam moderation?

When you're dealing with the DHF it's a matter of thinking of all proposals and their value. If you dislike one, upvote others to balance the distribution. Moving the bar around won't stop Hivewatchers but it'll hurt other proposals. The solution isn't to mess with proposals but to provide feedback that's actually timely.

Until you posted this post I've never spoken to anyone except MK here. Everyone knows they can message me and say whatever is on their mind and I'll keep it confidential and not retaliate. Most people do that. Now because no one said anything, with a few exceptions, and some random account came into the fold which is far beyond Hivewatchers scope, we're dealing with a mess where I can't even begin to figure out who is offended by what and who is posting what.

I personally don't give two shits if you're posting anti-Covid-lockdown posts or similar. People expressing their opinions on the internet isn't going to harm anything. You are not accused of hate crimes. Giving your opinion or being called a name isn't a hate crime. And opinions to the contrary aren't hate crimes. The only one who think that are those bots on Twitter that swarm users. That's just pure BS. This is why I created Dline (https://dline.xyz) so people from Hive could post whatever ideas they had without anyone mining their private info to set the Twitter mobs on them.

When i noticed @mmmmkkkk311 stopped posting it motivated me 50/50 with the what i took as some serious accusations to make this post. I really dislike watching people be cancelled and @mmmmkkkk311 is the one who originally explained a similar experience with logic on a forum I follow.

It seems like he is oppressed because he has Steem power, i know lots of people with steem power but as long as they are not manipulating the DPoS model and consensus model on hive, i dont care whats happening on steem.

You really should've talked to me first on whatever chat. He's not oppressed, he's a normal stakeholder.

Why would spaminator downvote his reply to me?