This is certainly a step in the right direction. I have no programming skills but I agree with a lot of the sentiment around the proposal system. I think there should be a "no interest" developer paid by DAO that can review codes like you're requesting and also serve to value proposals "Hive Auditor" / Internal Audit. Most of us are clueless. I know processes, not code (for now).

From my viewpoint, I see it as less of an attack on you personally but to the lack of transparency in actual value of proposals to users who lack the ability (like most) to understand their valuation.

I respect the fact you posted this though. Hopefully a good developer takes you up on this.