What would be your suggestions for improving the curent system for curation.... I dont see a lot of buzz against it, there for sure was a lot of buzz against the previous system... designing social media is for sure not an easy thing ... its trial and error thing imo
The original idea was
n^2instead ofn.I would suggest something similar, perhaps
n^(2*x), perhaps with x as a witness parameter even.I would need to simulate the numbers and look at some results... play around a little, before making a definite statement.
Certainly no proportional/linear function.
I recommend googling the 'steem whitepaper' and ctr+f 'crabs' and read the following passages.
If anyone wanted to fork this thing and try a different rewards_function, I'd be in.
That's because now, everyone gets a guaranteed return.
It's just that it is terrible advice to let the players design the game.
This result we see today proves it once again: The customer doesn't always know what he wants.
In the real world, only a few posts per day get all the attention.
The average person only reads so much.
If Hive wants to compete with traditional social media, we can not have shitposts on the trending page. We also can not reward effort. Not everyone can earn, because then the token becomes worthless.
Agreed.
You sound like an anti-capitalist/communist/authoritarian haha.. are you with the New World Order?
You sound like an idiot.
You sound like a web2 social media influencer with a following who is monetizing their shit off the backs of their audience.. "Not everyone can earn" lol
you sound like some dumb socialist, thinking that consumers should earn the biggest rewards
hmm?
We need a whole proposal system just for innovating curation. I hve a bunch of ideas i already went over. One is lile just blah blah blah bkah blah bkah
Blahbblah blah
Hive needs to be in schools
Also we need a hive twitter bot