You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What Are The Top Selling Points Of the Hive Blockchain & Who Are Their Target Audiences?

in #hive2 years ago

Hey, @Resonator. First off I'd like to thank you for this post, and the opportunity to discuss Hive and curation.
Also, many thanks for your manual curation efforts, including some recent support for my content. It has taken me 5 years (full time) of totally independent decentralized effort, not to mention investment and risk, in order to build my reputation and audience to the current point. I am an unbanked activist, husband, and father of 2 babies living in BC Canada. My dream has been to generate some crypto income by doing what I already love, creating original high quality content on topics like freedom, privacy, cannabis as medicine, activism, free markets, the Covid scam, monetary theory, etc. It tends to be stuff that gets censored by the mainstream, and attacked by statists. I am finally getting close to achieving a stable income of about 30 HIVE per post, each of which takes me about a day to research, photograph, write, etc. At current prices that's about $30 a day, which would be enough to cover some of my family's monthly costs. I'm approaching my first power down and test payout. Thanks to the support of excellent manual curators of independent content, some of my posts reached payouts around 40 HIVE recently.
Unfortunately, this seems to have attracted the disdain of blockchain bullies who are hitting me with large ($3 to $30+) downvotes. These accounts have higher rep than I do, so they're not only just removing my payouts, they're knocking my rep score down. Like I wrote in the linked post, I don't care about rep from an ego standpoint whatsoever. But it does have functional impacts on how this blockchain works. For example, posts and comments by low rep accounts are automatically pushed to the bottom of each feed or screen. If low enough, they are annotated with a warning, put behind a click-wall, and grayed out. As you write above, accounts and posts (usually) don't get outright deleted, but censorship is still absolutely possible here, and happening all the time. Hundreds of high quality content-creators like myself have been lost in recent months, thanks to these downvoting whale bullies. The agenda is to hide/downplay certain content, like Freedom Convoy. I notice they even went after the @freedomconvoy account's posts - and comments! Knocked it down in rep from 56 to 53. A few more days of that, and @freedomconvoy will be effectively gone.

This is not acceptable in my opinion, but what can I do? Whenever I confront people like this about their actions, they downvote me in retaliation, losing me even more money and visibility. If they respond at all, they say "how it works is you buy a bunch of HIVE and then you can downvote me back". So my only recourse is to play their game? Not only would I never do that, but I don't have $2 million to blow on HIVE. I'm living on next to nothing and have no savings except my HIVE balance I've worked tirelessly to accumulate. They are literally 1000 times larger than me. It takes them almost no effort or resources to completely remove all my payouts and all but scrub me from sight. I haven't broken any platform rules, I'm not plagiarizing, I'm not spamming, I'm not scamming. My content is what HIVE is made for. I'm finally barely pulling in 40 bucks for a day's work, and now I'm being knocked back to nothing for it? This is why HIVE can't grow, and why it is actually bleeding out good content-creators. I don't do this only for the money, but I've worked 5 years to get here, and I've yet to see my first cent for it. Many of these whales have been pulling in huge circle-jerk profits since this chain began, and they make hundreds on each of their nonsense spam posts, clogging up Trending with self-promotion and garbage. And many of them are going around UN-curating, undoing the good work that you and other quality curators are spending your time and resources on. Punishing complete strangers they see as competition - up and comers like myself. I recently broke into the top 1000 for rep (so less than 1000 people can negatively effect my score aka make efforts to censor me). I clawed my way up to #950 last week, before being sent tumbling back down by those high-rep whale downvotes. It would take them a while, but they could reduce me to nothing, and in the process, prevent me from accumulating any more HIVE and competing with them.

I love so many things about HIVE and I'm thankful for many things I've learned here. I also realize it is not what it could be, and we are being held back at a crucial time.

I think my comment has touched on most of the 6 categories you mentioned in your post. I hope you see this as constructive discussion. Maybe we can come up with solutions, or at least just be more actively conscious of the problem. Thank you!

Sort:  

Hey Drutter, we agree that you are right about the issues of balance on Hive . Hive reflects the economic situation in the rest of society in some ways, but still manages to show the world how decentralization can improve the lives of many people and help to give them a feeling of empowerment and liberty. The economics of the world were heavily biased/skewed in the favor of a small minority of people a very long time before Hive and even before the internet and computers existed. Hive isn't immune to these problems.

One way to tackle this situation is to onboard many new people who agree with your vision, so that instead of you personally needing to have millions of dollars worth of Hive - your fellow community members can collaborate to achieve a similar outcome. We often forget just how many people there are on Earth and once we come together we are hard to stop! Part of @resonator's mission is to help groups to achieve their goals by forming ever larger communities and empowering them with economic tools to create real change in their lives.

Let's all work together to build the tools that are most effective at helping us to build mutually beneficial communities.

Thanks for your support and suggestions :)

I have invited my followers from various platforms to join me here on Hive (and Steem) for 5 years. Only a few have done so, and none of them enjoyed the experience, quickly abandoning their accounts. Sadly, not even people in alternative circles such as precious metals investing, cannabis, libertarianism, and freedom are quick to embrace this blockchain. There are barriers many people just don't see a need to overcome. Of course, I will continue to hold out hope that it can change. That said, many of my supporters are small independent content-creators like me, with little or no capital other than their skills and efforts. Not to mention activists. Most of us have already given everything we can toward our causes, and have nothing to invest in Hive other than our footage, firsthand accounts, photography, strategies, inside info, documentaries, etc. Asking us to come up with money to fight investor whales with millions of HIVE is not realistic. We've already put all we have into HIVE. I invested 0.2 BTC (my life savings) at $8 in 2017 and after 5 years of fulltime work I'm still underwater. I'm already all in, at 18000 HIVE. I don't know anyone else who wants to buy HIVE. It sounds great on paper but it's not going to save my account. I just got another huge downvote, completely destroying a post I was proud of.

Looks like the strategy is to downvote my posts to $0 just before they hit 6 days. That prevents anyone from seeing or responding to it, cuts me off from every getting another HIVE, and drops my reputation down closer to being grayed out and hidden. I've seen it happen to dozens of great channels here, so I'm sure it has actually happened to thousands. It's one of the main reasons HIVE can't succeed - everybody knows only a small insider group can be paid for their content, and the rest are downvoted to $0 and driven away.

Your comment (and your post) touched on a great point about forming groups within a decentralized world. You're very right that this is a major challenge to be overcome, and I thank you for putting resources and effort toward that end. I've often noted that networking and organization within a decentralized platform/community is important, but difficult. One problem is many within the decentralized world don't recognize the need for it. Another is the difficulty in actually making it happen, since decentralized individuals are disorganized by nature, and little methods currently exist for networking. I've also seen this before when doing grassroots activism. Each activist is essentially a free agent, decentralized from the government and each other, with no leader. This is both a strength and a weakness, and I see the same thing here in the crypto world going forward. Identifying and leveraging those strengths could be a worthwhile goal.

Thank you for the discussion. I'm following your channel. Do you have any particular tags you like or recommend?