No matter what I can't process this matter here and that's primarily because I'm not the person you're actually looking for. I deal with phishing or some of our higher risk abusers. I don't process reports of copy/paste. By the comments you received from the main account we all know why, and that's because the same post was republished. That's in scope for obvious reasons. You're not on Spaminator. I know you're going to want to talk it out with me but like I said, that doesn't go anywhere. No one at HW can do anything without following procedure, particularly on something that wasn't their work in the first place.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Then it's time to get the person who has flagged these genuinely (and paid for) translations in here where the actual flagging took place. Processing matters off chain only leaves room for abuse of a centralized nature... and that is just bad policy for every owner of the blockchain for @HiveWatchers to continue to work from the shadows in an unaccountable way like this.
I would have you know that NONE of these posts have been copied and pasted from the original. They were all authentically translated and seeing as we are all responsible owners here on this blockchain... I don't see why I suddenly need to answer to the likes of @HiveWatchers (off chain) just because I wanted to reach a wider audience.
I don't like to be shuffled around like this Reese. It's a very bad practice and reflects poorly on you and @HiveWatchers.
Your the main organizer for this (what ever it is) and so I am still holding you responsible in this matter. If you don't think that you can handle this (as it's not your "business" to do so) then please speak with your associate and have them communicate with me right here.
I don't care if "this isn't your policy or practice". This is not an honest way to handle issues of Hive integrity and trust on the blockchain. By moving things off to the sides you are only creating a hostile, unfriendly, and untrustworthy social environment for EVERYONE.
If someone has truly infringed UPon this blockchains integrity.... wouldn't it make far more sense to deal with those issues on chain so that everyone knows exactly what's what about each and every "issue" that arises on the blockchain? These sorts of matters should always be open for the Hive Community (in general) to decide UPon. It (might) be UP to you and @HiveWatchers to present your case... But if this isn't done in a way that is open and transparent you are only flying in the face of every person attempting to make this blockchain their social home.
I am not going to continue to talk about "how practices need to adjust and change" with the @HiveWatchers "service"... But I'll have you know. THIS IS VERY UNPROFESSIONAL IN EVERY WAY... just like the last time.
I believe this way of dealing with things that happen on the blockchain are very bad for social and authentic engagement on this blockchain and I am not going to feed into it.
Please rectify this immediately.