You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Introducing CommentRewarder - A new service to reward comments

in #hive3 months ago

When the post is seven days old, and author rewards are paid out, CR distributes its share of the author rewards to the accounts that authored the eligible comments in the discussion thread.

Are all the upvoted comments rewarded from the share equally, or based on the comment upvote value? Would a higher beneficiary percentage reward more to the eligible comments? In what form is that share of author rewards distributed? HBD? HIVE? Both?

Sort:  

Discussed with @acidyo about how the upvote value should come into play.

We think it's best for the vote weight to be factored in, to give more control to the blog author.

An amazing reply could receive 100% upvote, for example and receive more reward than other replies (voted at 50% or less)

Another strategy for conserving voting power could be to vote each comment at 1% weight, and then CR will give equal weight to each comment.

We are implementing this change now.

Good to know, thanks! !BBH

@hivetrending! @ironshield likes your content! so I just sent 1 BBH to your account on behalf of @ironshield. (1/100)

(html comment removed: )

Great questions.

  • The rewards are shared equally, the upvote value doesn't matter currently.
  • Higher beneficiary percentage will increase rewards for the comments
  • Both Hive and HBD will be sent. Because author rewards come in as HivePower and HBD, we’ll provide some liquid Hive initially to get things going.

The rewards are shared equally

Hope it won't lead to spam. Someone can even farm accounts to post AI-generated comments. You can mute them but you can't know for sure especially if an account is new. Some restrictions (account age, HP, badge, membership in the community) could help... A badge would be perfect actually - the blue tick of Hive.

I was thinking about the blue tick of Hive idea.

The reputation score (73 for your account) works well most of the time. New accounts are starting at 25 rep. There are some cases where account builds up positive rep and then decides to start spamming. In that case, downvotes can gradually lower the rep.

Good, that will work. But adding HP criteria (1000 HP?) to that might be a good idea to incentivize buying $HIVE. Perhaps... 🤔

This could be happening today, and probably is for blog posts which are more lucrative for rewards. Curators have to use their best judgment to vote on meaningful content. For replies and CR, the blog author can decide which replies should be rewarded. After all, they decided to redirect some of the author rewards to CR.

Awesome, thanks!