You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The curation problem of HIVE. / Das Kurationsproblem HIVEs.

in #hive4 years ago

You can believe whatever you like, but of course I completely disagree.

IF matters had been discussed often enough, then obviously we would be closer to solve the problem.
But people seem to be so happy about their circle auto votes, that they forget to think about the overall effect on the platform and also the HIVE price.

Considering the state of the platform that should be discussed several times daily. :)

Sort:  

It is discussed severely times daily, just people aren’t posting about it.

You want to talk about it with people who have ideas to solve it, google and find older posts - miniature-tiger is a good place to start.

The curation window in his mind (and I think mine too) should be removed. Your reward is based on stake and not timing, any good?

It is discussed severely times daily, just people aren’t posting about it.

In any of these special 'secret-VIP-slacks'? :-)

You want to talk about it with people who have ideas to solve it, google and find older posts - miniature-tiger is a good place to start.

I actually need not to use startpage (or any other search engine) to find ideas like removing the curation window because that's one of the thoughts I mentioned myself in that post which I linked here in this actual article.
I have written quite some posts about topics like that.
I also know @miniature-tiger who unfortunately seems not to post here anymore.

Things would only change if users with some influence cared about these topics and ideas, but it seems they are living in their own microcosm, patting each other on the back!

Yes, HIVE is frustrating, STEEM is frustrating, too, especially as the original idea of a blockchain based, decentralised social network, where good content gets rewarded, is (was?) just brilliant.