First of all, trending still sucks, and any change thought to improve is better than doing nothing, I support you.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
First of all, trending still sucks, and any change thought to improve is better than doing nothing, I support you.
I disagree here. Trending, while not perfect, is exceedingly better then trending pre EIP.
After reading thru the many responses on my original post, I also concluded that an expansion of the curation window, with all curation during the window equal, is the next thing we should try. It's one of the things I want to see in the next hardfork.
I tried to delete this and reply at a more appropriate spot, but you'd already upvoted :-)
haha they call me ninja Dan
Check out Trending on Steemit :)
I can't. It is all in Asian language scripts and, like most ugly Americans, my international linguistic skills are lacking!
I agree with you there, but maybe I didn't explain myself well, I know you vote for what you like, and because you support the author because you know it's good content, but who hasn't seen a post with 0 reward go to 10 or more with just one vote? There's always a way to get around the system and still get rewarded for it @themarkymark
agreed
That's why I think your idea is good, trending is better, yes, but it still needs to be improved, that's where your idea comes in.
to be fair this isn't my idea, I borrowed most of the ideas to form this plan. things like expanded curation windows have been around for awhile and I credit blocktrades for the lower curation idea as I have not heard that one brought up a lot.