You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proposal: Core blockchain development, testing and documentation

in #hive4 years ago (edited)

Much respect for handling this question right way and with respect. I appreciate your explanation and the variables behind it.

I hope everyone can be as honest as you with how they approach the pool for payment, as there is risk for abuse if not supervised/audited from time to time. There's a lot of money there and I fear that others might help buddies out to milk money for work most normies can't measure, validate, or understand.

Are there continued checks and balances for all, or is it a factor trust in the long run by those who approve the proposals?

Thank you and good luck with your upcoming development.

Sort:  

Thank you !
Honestly right now it's mostly trust. It's up to the stakeholders to check if proposals are doing good work and unvote if they don't. Luckily most of our whales are technical persons so they can have a good idea if a technical proposal is delivering or not.